On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:47:47 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
P.P.S.: I am not sure what you should write in the Copyright field for
the upstream files, but (c) 1996-2012 by Thomas A. McGlynn does not
look right, as long as
Le Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Since one of the standard short names for the License field is
public-domain, I thought that specifying
Copyright: public-domain
License: public-domain
[explanation of why the files are in the public domain...]
On 01/12/2012 12:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:47:47 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
P.P.S.: I am not sure what you should write in the Copyright field for
the upstream files, but (c) 1996-2012 by Thomas A.
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:34:39 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
If you would like, you can open a wishlist bug, and if the specification is
updated in the future (there is no timeline for this and my opinion is that
currently it would be premature), this bug will remind us to consider adding a
4 matches
Mail list logo
