Le Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:06:01AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
Excess repetition makes many of us regulars pay less attention to the
topics. I'll mention this specific example, trying not to make it into
an ad-hominem: Francesco has a *great* license comprehension and
comparison skill, much
2013/9/3 Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org
Le Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:06:01AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
Excess repetition makes many of us regulars pay less attention to the
topics. I'll mention this specific example, trying not to make it into
an ad-hominem: Francesco has a *great*
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I wasn't planning on participating in this discussion but, as you said, it
has gotten so out of proportions that I thought it wouldn't be that bad
after all. I share Charles' and Gunnar's point of view, I appreciate
Francesco's
On 02/09/13 21:27, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
MJ Ray mjr at phonecoop.coop writes:
whether software follows the DFSG or not, yet the number of subscribers
seems to be generally increasing towards some asymptote
http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-legal.png
You know that l.d.o is not the only
On 01/09/13 16:39, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Perhaps you'd be interested in helping:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/01/msg00043.html
I'll make a better attempt to move this forwards later, but just as a
status update on that suggestion: I think Charles and I both subscribed
to
On 02/09/13 16:06, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But when an issue becomes such a FAQ (or FRT - Frequently Repeated
Topic), more efficient ways should be found. For example, we could
request the listmasters to add this information as a (short, one-line)
disclaimer to every post to the list, together with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/09/13 04:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
Francesco, if you want to get Debian to *change its position* on
licenses where you think an error has been made, please start a
discussion in an appropriate forum such as debian-project and Cc:
the ftp
Miriam Ruiz dijo [Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:43:22AM +0200]:
I wasn't planning on participating in this discussion but, as you said, it
has gotten so out of proportions that I thought it wouldn't be that bad
after all. I share Charles' and Gunnar's point of view, I appreciate
Francesco's
Steve Langasek dijo [Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:13:30PM -0700]:
(...)
Since Francesco has made it clear that he has no intention to stop his
abusive use of debian-legal (see below) or even recognize why his behavior
is problematic, I am asking the listmasters to ban him from this mailing
list.
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:04:20AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Steve Langasek dijo [Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:13:30PM -0700]:
So, my request is for you _not_ to ban him, but for Francesco to tone
down. Yes, this might re-escalate later on, and things might be
re-evaluated. But talking about
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:29:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that this discussion is going completely out of proportions.
Francesco always makes sure that his replies contain an informative
answer. In the last part of his emails, he adds his point of view in a
way that it is very
Francesco Poli has been a longtime subscriber to the debian-legal mailing
list. He has quite extensive knowledge about licensing, and is often the
first person to answer inquiries about new licenses sent to the list.
Not only that, but he reaches out to help you personally and does an
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:08:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:29:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that this discussion is going completely out of proportions.
Francesco always makes sure that his replies contain an informative
answer. In the last
While I may be considered a lurker on these lists, I have found
Francesco's feedback consistently insightful and thoughtful. I may not
always agree with some aspects of his views, but I fully believe a ban
would be an unwarranted and brash measure.
Regards,
Philip Paradis
On 9/3/13 07:58 ,
14 matches
Mail list logo
