Dear debian-legalers,
Under the sponsorship of Sébastien Villemot and the Debian science
team, I am in the process of adopting the COIN-OR scientific packages
for linear programming and extensions (incl. coinutils, coinor-osi,
clp, coinor-cbc, etc.).
Here's the issue:
- Since the last upload,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:18:58AM -0400, Miles Lubin wrote:
Dear debian-legalers,
Yo, Miles!
- The debian directory had no explicit license mentioned in the
copyright file. It was pointed out by Paul Tagliamonte that the
Oh yes, I remember this.
previous maintainer(s) must agree to the
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
It's a skitch hazy, but I don't think there's an issue with
distributing CC-BY and GPL code in the same tarball -- the only issue is
this *MAY* result in GPL issues if *upstream* is GPL, if you've checked
out some of the CDDL
There is something implicit in paultag's mail, I'll try to make it
explicit. The new license must not be used for any of the existing
files, unless there is a complete rewrite. For example,
debian/changelog is likely to get new copyrightable content and having
that under the two licenses would not
Le Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:18:58AM -0400, Miles Lubin a écrit :
Here's the issue:
- Since the last upload, upstream has switched from the CPL (Common
Public License) to the EPL (Eclipse Public License).
- The debian directory had no explicit license mentioned in the
copyright file. It was
5 matches
Mail list logo
