Il 02/10/2013 01:40, Charles Plessy ha scritto:
As for CC0, as Ben explained, it is a license, and the simplest is to list the
copyright holders as for other licenses.
Hi,
thanks for the suggestion. (BTW, is the fact that CC0 is a licence
rather than a dedication an accepted POW? I thought
Gioele Barabucci gio...@svario.it writes:
thanks for the suggestion. (BTW, is the fact that CC0 is a licence
rather than a dedication an accepted POW? I thought it was still an
open question.)
The conservative position, since the current copyright regime makes it
extremely difficult to divest
On 02/10/13 08:49, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
(BTW, is the fact that CC0 is a licence
rather than a dedication an accepted POW? I thought it was still an
open question.)
My understanding is that it's both, stuck together, in one convenient
document - to work around the jurisdictions where you
Il 02/10/2013 10:01, Ben Finney ha scritto:
Could the copyright-format page [1] be changed to state more
explicitly that the Copyright field should list the names of the
authors even in the case of public domain works (or works licensed via
CC0)?
I don't see that follows from what we've
Gioele Barabucci gio...@svario.it writes:
I'm sorry but I fear that my main message did not came across. I will
try reformulating my question with a example.
Thank you.
We have the case of software foobar released by John Doe using the
licence CC0. foobar is not in the public domain (John
Le Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:49:46AM +0200, Gioele Barabucci a écrit :
Could the copyright-format page [1] be changed to state more
explicitly that the Copyright field should list the names of the
authors even in the case of public domain works (or works licensed
via CC0)? I would like to file
6 matches
Mail list logo
