Ian, thank you for taking the time to give us valuable advice.
We have already been in touch with our lawyer to check the circumstances of our
actual application code, which also makes use of open-source software
components, libraries, servers, etc. By now, I think it makes sense to also
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:55 PM, James Wade jpsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There seems to be some confusion over the PHP License.
We had this bug report into a PEAR project which outlines that Debian
cannot include any projects that fall under the PHP License.
*
debian-legal isn't the body that makes this decision, you might want
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:55 PM, James Wade jpsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There seems to be some
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
If you feel to dispute this please take your *well-formed* and
*well-thought* arguments to debian-legal.
... to discuss it. d-legal is a proper venue for *discussing* it, but
it's not the right one to discuss the actual
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
debian-legal isn't the body that makes this decision, you might want
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
Thanks,
Paul
Hi Paul,
To quote Ondřej from
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
If you feel to dispute this please take your *well-formed* and
*well-thought* arguments to debian-legal.
... to discuss it. d-legal is a proper
Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've find it a bit disturbing, that ftpmasters can make a decision on legal
grounds(which is the probably the highest priority for debian as far as I'm
concerned), without any backing from debian-legal
debian-legal has no authority to decide anything. It
On 07/29/2014 03:16 PM, Walter Landry wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've find it a bit disturbing, that ftpmasters can make a decision on legal
grounds(which is the probably the highest priority for debian as far as I'm
concerned), without any backing from debian-legal
Le Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:47:34PM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
from the replies on the debian mailing lists it seems that this decision on
dropping any project using the php license distributed outside of php-src
is controversial to say the least.
Hello Ferenc,
from an outsider point of
Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com writes:
I see absolutely no problem with PHP projects distributed from
*.php.net carrying the PHP license. The license talks about PHP
Software which we define as software you get from/via *.php.net.
Specifically, the license text
On 30/07/14 10:21, Ben Finney wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com writes:
I see absolutely no problem with PHP projects distributed from
*.php.net carrying the PHP license. The license talks about PHP
Software which we define as software you get from/via *.php.net.
Specifically, the
hi Walter,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Walter Landry wlan...@caltech.edu wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've find it a bit disturbing, that ftpmasters can make a decision on legal
grounds(which is the probably the highest priority for debian as far as I'm
concerned),
Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch
writes:
On 30/07/14 10:21, Ben Finney wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com writes:
I see absolutely no problem with PHP projects distributed from
*.php.net carrying the PHP license. The license talks about PHP
Software
13 matches
Mail list logo
