[Please keep Ira Kalet and the Debian Med mailing list in CC]
Hello,
I'm forwarding a part of a discussion to you legal experts for
clarification:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:15:49AM -0700, Ira Kalet wrote:
3. Finally, there is still the issue of what the US FDA might say
about distribution
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm forwarding a part of a discussion to you legal experts for
clarification:
I'm afraid debian-legal is mostly armchair lawyers. If you want to
consult actual lawyers, it would be best to get legal advice from the
SFLC, who we have gotten
Draft question for SFLC:
Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP
licence. These worries are dismissed by other members and by relevant
upstreams.
We are concerned here with the PHP 3.0 Licence, which can be found
here: http://php.net/license/3_0.txt
There are two
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:22:50 +0100 Ian Jackson wrote:
Draft question for SFLC:
[...]
We are concerned here with the PHP 3.0 Licence, which can be found
here: http://php.net/license/3_0.txt
Wait! This license version is already obsolete!
Please revise your draft in light of the current
PHP
Francesco Poli writes (Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license):
Wait! This license version is already obsolete!
Thanks for pointing that out.
Please revise your draft in light of the current
PHP License, version 3.01:
http://php.net/license/3_01.txt
On 1 August 2014 17:59:11 CEST, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
wrote:
Similar situations often arise in relation to trademarks. Our usual
approach in such cases has been to rely on the informal assurances,
and not seek any kind of formal trademark licence amendment.
I thought we
Last minute concerns:
The warranty disclaimer states that the software is provided by the PHP
development team. What if it isn't? Do people that are not members of
the PHP development team have the right to make that claim on their behalf?
Similarly, the license includes the phrase This software
Le Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:59:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
Draft question for SFLC:
Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP
licence. These worries are dismissed by other members and by relevant
upstreams. We would like some advice.
Hello Ian and
Le Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:10:49AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
I think that it is important that a few of the ‘some members’ would identify
themselves in support for that request, and explain what they would do if the
worries expressed below turned out to be true.
Sorry for the extra
Another thought: Doesn't the Zend Engine License also have the same
problem as the PHP License in that we are not allowed to use the words
Zend or Zend Engine for modified versions of the Zend Engine?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
10 matches
Mail list logo
