Hello,
I have a few questions regarding public domain and DEP-5-compliant
debian/copyright files:
1. I have files in a program with the following copyright statement:
# Copyright (C) 2002-2010, 2013, 2014 ...
# Copyright (C) 2000 ...
#
# This program is in the public
Le Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Florent Rougon a écrit :
1. I have files in a program with the following copyright statement:
# Copyright (C) 2002-2010, 2013, 2014 ...
# Copyright (C) 2000 ...
#
# This program is in the public domain.
but, as I
Florent Rougon f.rou...@free.fr writes:
1. I have files in a program with the following copyright statement:
# Copyright (C) 2002-2010, 2013, 2014 ...
# Copyright (C) 2000 ...
#
# This program is in the public domain.
but, as I understand it, public domain is the
I would recommend the copyright holders re-release the work clearly
marked with a license grant of broad attribution-only license
conditions; the Apache Software Foundation License 2.0
URL:http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache2.0 is a good one IMO.
If they really want public domain,
Hi,
I am reviewing the package lutris (ITP #754129). From upstream[1]:
---
Lutris is an open source gaming platform for GNU/Linux. It makes
gaming on Linux easier by taking care of managing, installing and
providing optimal settings for games.
Lutris does not sell games, you have to provide
Ben Finney writes (Re: Public domain and DEP-5-compliant debian/copyright):
Florent Rougon f.rou...@free.fr writes:
1. I have files in a program with the following copyright statement:
# Copyright (C) 2002-2010, 2013, 2014 ...
# Copyright (C) 2000 ...
#
# This
Eriberto Mota writes (Simple doubt about section to use):
I am reviewing the package lutris (ITP #754129). From upstream[1]:
This seems like a package manager.
My doubt is if is a main or contrib program. I think in main, because
lutris can survive running DFSG games only. However, we have
Thanks Ian!
Pierre, you need think about what to do.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-16 13:46 GMT-03:00 Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk:
At DC14 we had a conversation about the fact that at the moment it is
not possible for a user to say only once, when installing Debian, that
they
2014-09-16 14:53 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro:
Unfortunately, Lutris does not provide any information about the games'
licence.
So I guess we should add it to contrib ?
I think that it is the better way.
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Unfortunately, Lutris does not provide any information about the games'
licence.
So I guess we should add it to contrib ?
Regards,
Le 16/09/2014 19:18, Eriberto a écrit :
Thanks Ian!
Pierre, you need think about what to do.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-16 13:46 GMT-03:00 Ian Jackson
Pierre Rudloff writes (Re: Simple doubt about section to use):
Unfortunately, Lutris does not provide any information about the games'
licence.
So I guess we should add it to contrib ?
I think so, I'm afraid.
Maybe there is part of it that doesn't involve the library feature, or
in other
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
This is nonsense. Courts are not computers. When interpreting legal
documents such as licences, they read the intent of of the author.
We would hope so, yes. They also take into account the intent of the
*current* copyright holder.
Courts
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:10:53AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
Hi,
I am reviewing the package lutris (ITP #754129). [...]
My doubt is if is a main or contrib program. I think in main, because
lutris can survive running DFSG games only. However, we have the
possibility to install
13 matches
Mail list logo
