RE:EADL license

> The EADL data was created by US Government employees (Lawrence > Livermore). So there is no copyright in the US. Also, in the US, > there is no copyright in a set of facts. However, as a courtesy, you > should preserve the credits. Thanks a lot Fred

Re: EADL license

PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello still exploring my package > > I found this. > > Is it DFSG-free ? > > #F EADL97_MShellConstants.dat > #U00 This file is a conversion to specfile format of > #U01 directly extracted EADL97 Shell constants. >

EADL license

Hello still exploring my package I found this. Is it DFSG-free ? #F EADL97_MShellConstants.dat #U00 This file is a conversion to specfile format of #U01 directly extracted EADL97 Shell constants. #U02 to simplify its use with the fisx and PyMca software packages. #U03 #U04 Neither those

RE:NIST data licenses/copyright

> Copyright Protection for NIST Standard Reference Data (SRD) > > Copyright protection on this compilation of data has been secured by the U.S. > Department of Commerce in the United States and in other countries that are > parties to the Universal Copyright Convention, pursuant to Section

Re: NIST data licenses/copyright

PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel writes ("NIST data licenses/copyright"): > I am packaging something which contain some NIST data [1]. The > license refered by is reproduce here. > > I would like to know if this license is DFSG-free or not. ... > License Information for NIST data (other than Standard

NIST data licenses/copyright

Hello I am packaging something which contain some NIST data [1]. The license refered by is reproduce here. I would like to know if this license is DFSG-free or not. thanks for your help. Frederic License Information for NIST data (other than Standard Reference Data (SRD)) This data was