Re: sct public domain

Ian Jackson writes: > Jacob Adams writes ("Re: sct public domain"): > > Ok that makes sense. Wasn't sure if public domain was more > > complicated but clearly not. > > "Public domain" is very complicated. It means different things in > different places :-(. But

Re: sct public domain

Jacob Adams writes ("Re: sct public domain"): > On 06/24/2016 04:00 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Jacob Adams writes ("sct public domain"): > >> Firstly, the license of sct consists of one line: > >> /* public domain, do as you wish > > > > Seems like a clear enough intent to dedicate to the public