Re: drbdmanage EULA conforming to DFSG?

> Markus Frosch writes ("drbdmanage EULA conforming to DFSG?"): >> I, myself, would consider the license non-free in terms of DFSG, due to this >> paragraph: >> >> > 3.4) Without prior written consent of LICENSOR or an authorized partner, >> > LICENSEE is not allowed to: >> > [...] >> > b)

Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?

Pali Rohár writes ("Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?"): > Can you review proposed package? Willdo. Regards, Ian. -- Ian Jackson These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses

Re: drbdmanage EULA conforming to DFSG?

Markus Frosch writes ("drbdmanage EULA conforming to DFSG?"): > I, myself, would consider the license non-free in terms of DFSG, due to this > paragraph: > > > 3.4) Without prior written consent of LICENSOR or an authorized partner, > > LICENSEE is not allowed to: > > [...] > > b) provide