On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 10:17:24PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Is the new Apache License really GPL compatible?
Not according to the FSF. Cf. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
"A dynamic char
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Starner:
No, I don't believe so. Libreadline is GPL and I don't believe it can be
linked with the Artistic license.
Gergely Madarasz:
Hmm... isn't the Artistic licence compatible with GPL ? I thought it
was...
Mark Jones and the other HUGS
would explicitly like
to encourage people to distribute LyX in both source and binary forms.
This permission certainly includes linking against GUI toolkits like
XForms, Motif, GTK+, Qt or Win32. A copy of the GNU General Public
License version 2 follows.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repent
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 10:42:00AM -0600, David Starner wrote:
This permission certainly includes linking against GUI toolkits like
XForms, Motif, GTK+, Qt or Win32. A copy of the GNU General Public
License version 2 follows.
It sounds like the author
Navindra Umanee wrote:
Montreal Fri Jan 22 13:45:25 1999
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use LyX as my main word processor, and it's found in Contrib.
Then why send this email? It is only likely to start a long flame war
with the potential result of having LyX removed from
Raul Miller wrote:
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I want is for Debian to hold to the principles it has set itself. I
feel LyX has some of the same problems as KDE, and that if there was
agreement on that, that the similar actions should be taken. I feel that
Debian-legal
Raul Miller wrote:
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because LyX is under the same License as KDE - straight GPL. I
don't believe the quoted information from the webpage has any legal
standing. If it does, then it should be in /usr/doc/lyx/copyright, and
all /usr/doc/lyx/copyright
to include it in a
program without following the Artistic or GPL, then email him and he'll
hook you up - probably for a hefty fee. Still, completely DFSG-free.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dullard: someone who, wanting a piece of information, takes down the
appropriate volume
. If the mantainer's not
around, maybe someone can do a NMU, as this is a Slink critical bug?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dullard: someone who, wanting a piece of information, takes down the
appropriate volume of the encyclopedia, looks up the item they need, and
then puts the volume away
includes the header files. Under normal
operation, it then opens a pipe to send this to the compiler.
--
David Starner - OSU student - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want a real optimist, look up Ray Bradbury. Guy's nuts.
He actually likes people. -David Brin
was changed, then Debian should be
satisfied. Better yet, if there is only one author, change the license
to LGPL or MPL or something else.
--
David Starner - OSU student - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want a real optimist, look up Ray Bradbury. Guy's nuts.
He actually likes people. -David Brin
with permission to combine Lyx with other programs was enough.)
It's not GPL'ed (While LyX has been released nominally under the GPL in
the past, it has in fact never been truly GPL.), and the license
resulting from the combination of the GPL and the clarification is
clearly DFSG-free.
--
David Starner
release programs under this rather than GPL.
The only unusual is that you must add a file named LEGAL containing any
legal issues you know about and if you add any code that is covered by a
patent you own. I can't see anyone thinking that's not free, but I'll
mention it anyway.
--
David Starner
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
David Starner wrote:
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Darren Benham wrote:
The most recent version of Lyx had a license change (I am told) for the
very same reason.
No. The current version has had a _clarification_ added, but is
still very much GPLed
At 03:39 PM 6/1/99 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
License:
Xslideshow
Copyright 1993-1997 by Susumu Shiohara
All Rights Reserved
-- from Copyright --
Permission to use, copy, modify,
(IMHO). You might want to check out the Open Content
License (http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/) or look at what the FSF uses
on their manuals (grab any GNU progam's texinfo file and take a look.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alternately [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would weep, but my tears have
At 06:46 AM 7/8/99 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You might want to check out the Open Content
License (http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/)
That's only free as long as you don't check any of the options.
That's arguable. Given that, we couldn't distribute
you the right of modification, or permit you to use it on a computer not
your own. No question in my mind, it's not free.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alternately [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would weep, but my tears have been stolen; I would shout, but my voice
has been taken. Thus, I write
of endevor. Note that Berkeley
has a program (or so I've heard) that still prohibits South African police
from using it, because of their past history, and nobody has changed the
license.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alternately [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would weep, but my tears have been stolen
At 02:37 AM 8/1/99 -0400, Mike Goldman wrote:
David Starner wrote:
At 11:15 PM 7/31/99 -0400, Mike Goldman wrote:
PM3: Polytechnique Montreal Modula-3
The only open question, which I have been discussing on debian-legal, is
whether this package needs to go into non-free or whether it can go
purposes, and a Jew adding restrictions to prohibt it being used
for non-kosher purposes.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alternately [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would weep, but my tears have been stolen; I would shout, but my voice
has been taken. Thus, I write. - Tragic Poet
software
project to use GPL code under a license more compatible with their project.
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian demands for something
in main.
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# software.
Debian has not required documentation and other text documents to allow
modifiaction to be in main.
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 04:06:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 09:04:08PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 06:58:26PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
Debian has not required documentation and other text documents to allow
modifiaction to be in main
their mind.)
But the frontend actually has to be linked to GCC. A more similar one
is the M3 frontend, which evades the GPL restrictions by installing
a new frontend (which is GPL), and using program calls to link to that
program.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 07:45:43PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(This case seems similar to the one
where Next wanted to ship GCC with their own Objective-C frontend, but
not to release the frontend under the GPL. RMS had his laweyrs write
, Ian Jackson wrote:
David Starner writes (Re: Corel's apt frontend):
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 01:58:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
However, of course, lib-apt isn't the only thing that is bound
together at run-time with Qt in this program. dpkg is too - the fact
that the interface
.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or any GPL program on a
proprietary X server. Those would be the same sort of aggretion as get_it
calling dpkg.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the system.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
went that way, or no one cared enough
to do anything about it.
Oh, and this is going to legal, as that's the appropriate list.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for Qhull, it is
provided solely as is. Bug reports or fixes may be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; the authors may or may not act on them as
they desire.
It's mostly fairly standard keep our copyrights on the stuff, and
don't mess with anything. I think it's DFSG-free.
--
David Starner
.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message property of the Secret Masters. Unauthorized
duplication or reading will result in execution. Aren't
you glad nothing happens without the authorization of
the Secret Masters?
pgp8YhZx8NDNV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
there may be
a chance to change it.
Besides the requirement that you demonstrate your modification, it's fine.
I don't know what he was trying to say there, though.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message property of the Secret Masters. Unauthorized
duplication or reading will result
take the frontend to that and try
for a Modula-3 frontend to GCC.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Because of current mail difficulties, I'd appreciate it if you
keep the cc's to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on any replies. Thanks
place, we're taking the safe route. No one can sue us for
not having KDE in Debian. Debian doesn't ask lawyers because it can't
afford to, money-wise. In most circumstances (fortune database aside),
Debian just doesn't touch stuff with unclear (or inapprorpiate)
licenses.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL
it is not a sufficent
excuse.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 10:13:44PM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:36:05PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
Moving to Debian-Legal...
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 08:11:49PM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
I've been having a conversation with the
upstream authors of VICE
to assume that he knows
about free software and explain why it would be nice for it to be DFSG-free,
instead of trying to evangalize the GPL.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard
.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
of contract, negligence or
other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use
or performance of this software.
I believe Lucent Technologies was part of ATT when SML/NJ was first
released under this license.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong
on the subject.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
Hess? Sorry I can't remember who right
now) who would argue that there is no distinction - that we shouldn't
have the RFC's in Debian proper without the full right to modify
and distribute as per the DFSG.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses
and he is going to add it, but he is also
considering to use the LGPL instead of the GPL.
The LGPL is incompatible with almost nothing, so long as the other
license is compatible with it. No, you don't need to add the Qt notice
if you want to link LGPL code against QT.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL
-free. Some (POV-Ray) have have funky restrictions on how you can
sell it on CD. Non-free is full of funky licensed programs that can be
mirrored by Debian but have weird restrictions, especially where money
changes hands.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong
with code from schneier's book maybe someone else
knows.
I believe it's public domain, as the author says. There's no
evidence to say that public domain isn't being used in the
strict legal sense, which is clearly DFSG-Free.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about
-directories are distributed under the terms of the Q Public
License version 1.0 (included below).
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
to keep people from improving inferior
technologies. (Sorry if that was a little opinionated - but
the facts should be accurate.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math
have permission to distribute.
Is Debian not a distributor of Lisp compilers and interpreters?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The hell that is supposedly out there could be no worse than
the hell that is sometimes seen in here.
will contribute the patches back
under both licenses. It seems doubtful that even if QT was released QPL/GPL,
that there would be any really major work done on a GPL-only version, even with
the number of QT/TT haters out there.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The hell that is supposedly out
to the one that
comes in the box) includes a collection of TrueType fonts for which the
license prohibits commercial distribution. I don't think what another
distibution thinks it can get away with has anything to do with Debian
should do.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp
packagers,
because they should have first shot at this.
Unless someone can come up with some practical reason (can kde-libs be built
without kde-base?) or some legal reason why not, let's see the KDE libs
in Debian.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic
on the license before discussing
it with the author, forward the whole thing to debian-legal, and I,
at least, will dissect and discuss, if no one else will.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic character with an ability to survive certain death
with
restrictions on associated licenses like this. Which clause does it violate?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic character with an ability to survive certain death and
a questionable death scene leaving no corpse? Face it, we'll never
see her again. - Sluggy
in, and a strong moral reason
not to.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic character with an ability to survive certain death and
a questionable death scene leaving no corpse? Face it, we'll never
see her again. - Sluggy Freelance
. GNAT's run time libraries
are all GPL + you can do anything with them in binary form. Guile has a
license like that, too.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic character with an ability to survive certain death and
a questionable death scene leaving
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 10:17:24PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Is the new Apache License really GPL compatible?
Not according to the FSF. Cf. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic character
and it has the
licenses linked to most of them. Some of the developers are less careful
than others, so just because a license is in main doesn't guarentee that
general consensus would say it is acceptable.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
A dynamic character
the gif.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, Rock and Roll Children
compiler, like early versions of emacs. It's obvious
that RMS disagreed, as he distributed early versions of emacs.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:26:44AM -0400, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
I think Gecko is under the MPL, not NPL. I'm not sure however if MPL is
compatible
or not with the GPL (the NPL is certainly not) but it has much more chance...
For
It's not. Cf. the licenses page at www.gnu.org.
--
David
security problem is discovered
with the package.
Do what several maintainers have already done - release under a modified
name. (See nowebm, for example.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever
on unpackagable mp3 encoders. Except for the patent
problem, they are completely free. It's sort of a weird way to put abcde in
main, considering that very few people would actually use it with vorbize.
But yes, this would put it in main.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp
the largest public domain program I've
ever seen.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, Rock and Roll Children
, the
issue seems to be that you only included the summary in .../doc/wx*/copyright
and put the license in .../doc/wx*/license.txt. less /usr/share/doc/*/copyright
has the actual license in the copyright file whenever it's not LGPL or GPL.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp
- GPL'ed Delphi code can (and I believe does) exist
and is not unfree because it needs Delphi to build.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye
Foundation, Inc.
Whoa! Isn't this the program that RMS said the University of Washington
threatened to sue them over?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night
wrt. copyright law, aside from implict
permission to download.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, Rock and Roll Children
for them to
shape up.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, Rock and Roll Children
.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
- Dio, Rock and Roll Children
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 01:06:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Please! I've been getting 3 copies of this conversation about this stupid
argument. Can we cut CC's to debian-legal and other essentials, please?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting
such action is the sole responsibility of the person
committing the action.
This provision of the licence blatently violates section 6 of
the DFSG which states:
We've had arguments over export regulations, and the general consensus
is that they aren't DFSG free, so this isn't either.
--
David
international laws (technically, the Constitution never
gave the UN any law making power, so as long as the U.S. is a soverign
nation, internation law is only binding so long as it's enforced by
a corresponding local law.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling
the license? I think pretty much
all the arguments in this thread for the clause would also apply to
such a clause.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:07:22PM -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David Starner wrote:
The DFSG is designed to be an objective standard.
Not really, it's way too broad for that. If it were completely objective
there'd be no debate about whether a given license
. RSA didn't put any code into the public domain, they merely
made the (almost meaningless) gesture of putting a patent in the public
domain - two weeks before it would have been there anyway.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some
in the public domain for the last decade. The
RSA people didn't release any software to the public domain, so that's
irrelevant. Your example is totatlly bogus.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote:
Also, if that license is OK, should I package it with ICU, or should I try
to get it included in base-files?
Why would you include it in base-files? It's not exactly a common license.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp
. If I
remember from the last time I poked through base, counting licenses and GNU
stuff, there were several programs that had their own special license just
there.
So if it's not common, it should go into /usr/share/docs/mypackage, right?
Not in /usr/share/common-licenses.
Yep.
--
David
.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
-- RHPS
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:00:56AM -0500, Pat Mahoney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:44:06PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
Again, any thoughts on the Open Compatibility License (other than the
fact that it has the same abbrev. as the Open Content License)?
It's ugly, but I think it's
, proprietary code.
s/strictly speaking//g; s/one might argue that//g;
There's no legal question here, no arguments; that's what the
law says.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe;
if you wish to be a devotee of truth
to modify or compile a copy of a copyright work you
have a legal copy of. I don't see how you could create an implicit
license to redistribute, so no there.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe;
if you wish to be a devotee
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:17:31PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:45:15PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
Permission to use, copy, redistribute is granted. Permission to
redistribute modifications in patch form is granted. Permission
to redistribute binaries made
distribute cyrpto programs
now, if someone was willing to register ftp.debian.org with the US. The
Mozilla people have done it and have some notes about it.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
As centuries of pulp novels and late-night Christian broadcasting have taught
us
at no charge to all third
^
Doesn't this prohibit commercial distribution?
Nope. You can't charge for the license, but you can charge for a copy.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
As centuries of pulp novels and late
: program support).
Violates DFSG #5 (Fields of Endeavor: commerical purposes).
You might want to point out how vague commerical purposes is. If it
can't be used in a buisness, then that's a big issue.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
(You see, the best way to solve
text). Also as a pragmatic
issue, we need the rights to redistrubite at no cost, on any media and
sell the document on CD's.
If some one needs free document licenses, why don't we just point them
to GNU?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
(You see, the best way to solve
, particularly suited or not. If you don't like the license,
then ask the author to change it. No need for formality.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
-- RHPS
fine.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
-- RHPS
pgp1IJv7k3Utf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
them to be distributed
under the same terms as the license implies being able to restrict people
from distributing them under different terms; the patch clause (#4)) are
specified in the DFSG.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recovering from a hard drive crash - website down
notice.
This is the only thing that's unusual, and I don't see why it would
be non-DFSG-free. (It might be unenforcable, but that's his problem.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
to be bound by all of its terms and conditions.
This is the only part that seems non-free. If I read this right, it's
a restriction on distribution Debian can't satisfy even in non-free; we
would have to make sure anyone we distributed to agreed before we gave
them a copy.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL
a freeamp.rpm
including arial.ttf, and - contrary to Debian - they are for-profit.
(3) is the only sane solution, and it needs to be done ASAP.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me
are also non-free, but passable, though the license is
absurd (there's no reverse-engineering needed, for crying out loud!)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd
the no monies part mean you can't charge money for the act of
distributing libcompface?
It seems obvious to me. Is there some reason you have for reading it
another way?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
I don't care if Bill personally has my name
writing can be copyrighted, but the rules themselves can't
be.) Note that Debian has (at least) two games with the same rules
as Othello, named GNOME Iagno and Kreversi. Follow that example and
you should be all right.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
I
. Do you need more
from me than just this email?
I don't think so, but I'd better let ouer legal people decide that. Thanx!
That's all we need. Thanks!
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my
-free is moot.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored. - Joseph_Greg
pgpj3bNboFX3W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
