Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote: Hi! Debian began to send requests to change PHP license for the PHP Extension arguing that the PHP License is only valid for PHP itself. That's like saying Apache license is only valid for Apache httpd, and

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ulf Wendel ulf.wen...@phpdoc.de wrote: Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: I think they just

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 09:56 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: I think the difference is that we have a couple of clauses which sounds weird/makes no sense when the license is used for extensions or anything else

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:55 PM, James Wade jpsw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, There seems to be some confusion over the PHP License. We had this bug report into a PEAR project which outlines that Debian cannot include any projects that fall under the PHP License. *

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote: debian-legal isn't the body that makes this decision, you might want ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Thanks, Paul Hi Paul, To quote Ondřej from

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: If you feel to dispute this please take your *well-formed* and *well-thought* arguments to debian-legal. ... to discuss it. d-legal is a proper

Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014.07.30. 3:35, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au ezt írta: Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com writes: I see absolutely no problem with PHP projects distributed from *.php.net carrying the PHP license. The license talks about PHP Software which we define as software you get from/via

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > (resending because my MUA messed up) > > > > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for > pear/pecl extensions"): > > > When I

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

2015. dec. 3. 22:20 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" <tyr...@php.net>): > > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern <n...@halon.org.uk> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: >> > (resending because

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2015. dec. 3. 22:20 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" <tyr...@php.net>): > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern <n...@halon.org.uk> > wrote: &g

debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

Hi, What is the current progress on this? >From the archives I can see that there were a draft of questions to be sent to the SFLC(https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2014/08/msg00062.html) but the last mail about that was almost a year ago pinging the ftpmasters for approval of the questions(

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Ángel González wrote: > If the current FAQ entry related to PHP hasn't changed since > http://web.archive.org/web/20051016231155/http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html, > I don't think the entry, and most importantly the phrase « That

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> 2015. dec. 3. 22:20 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" <tyr...@php.net>): >> > >

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

missing which would make debian distributing pear/pecl.php.net packages problematic based on this legal advice? 2016. febr. 22. 18:40 ezt írta ("Ian Jackson" < ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>): > Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for > pe

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

is topic from SFLC. > >>>>>> IIRC we were planning to publish it, or a synopsis, or something ? > > >>>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Neil McGovern <n...@halon.org.uk> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> AIUI, yes. FTP Masters? >

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ian Jackson < ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for > pear/pecl extensions"): > > Thanks, I will try to not give up. > > I think this continued delay is g

Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions

2016. febr. 22. 20:12 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" <tyr...@gmail.com>): > > Hi Ian, > > Thanks for the reply. > I see that there is no answer for Q4 in your forwarded mail, was that originally not answered or just lost somewhere when forwarding? > My understanding