[ Sorry for the duplicate, I sent the initial post to debian-devel,
but was suggested this mailing list instead. So -again- could someone
please help me figure out the following issue.]
I am trying to understand some license issue I am having. Could
someone let me know if the following is
Hi all,
I am working on the package for Java Components for Mathematics
(#667923). Some files are distributed with a clear public domain type
license:
This source code file, and compiled classes derived from it, can
be used and distributed without restriction, including for commercial
use.
FYI, upstream agreed to change the pseudo public domain license into
an MIT one (expat):
http://math.hws.edu/javamath/
Thanks everyone for comments/suggestions.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Francesco Poli
invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:10:26 -0700 Steve Langasek
Hi,
I recently received a report that jai-* packages may not be
compatible with debian non-free. Specifically I am looking at
jai-core's MEDIALIB FOR JAI/SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS section 2:
...
2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to the license granted
in Section 1 (Software
[CC me please]
Hi there,
Could someone please clarify why OpenJDK 7.0 went to main with the
following license:
http://openjdk.java.net/legal/
- http://openjdk.java.net/legal/OpenJDK-TCK_SE7_27Dec2011.pdf
...
1.1 “Compatible Licensee Implementation” means a Licensee
Implementation that (i)
Hi there,
I cannot find any older thread discussing zstd being in the main
section of Debian, so I am raising the subject just for later
reference.
Could someone please confirm this is acceptable for main, in
particular the section: "The license granted hereunder will terminate,
", see below
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jeff Epler writes:
>
>> Apparently,
>> https://github.com/facebook/zstd
>> https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/LICENSE
>> https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/PATENTS
>
> Thank you for
7 matches
Mail list logo