DFSG-compatible, right?
Thanks.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would like to
dual-licence it myself, under the same terms -- GPL and a commercial
licence.
Now to get the right of dual-licensing, do I have to obtain a commercial
licence from the author of libfoo?
If yes, why? If no, why not? Please elucidate. Thanks.
Shriramana Sharma
some algorithms?
3. If Y adds new functionality to the library?
4. If Y just restructures the library in a more efficient manner.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is DFSG-free -- i.e. product A may be
packaged for Debian
Thank you.
Shriramana Sharma.
/*
Copyright (C) 2007, Company X, Country Y. All rights reserved.
This file is part of Product A Open Source Edition.
This file may be used under the terms of the GNU General Public License version
2.0
.
Well actually I based my header on Qt's header. So I think it should be
allright.
If no one else has any objections, I'll go ahead and do this.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for all your feedback.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it superfluous to use it after the word
copyright which itself means the same thing?
Thanks for your advice,
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such reports by the end of this month, I will assume
that the list has approved it and go ahead and apply it.
Thank you, as always.
Shriramana Sharma.
/*
Copyright (C) 2007, Company X, Country Y. All rights reserved.
This file is part of Product A.
You may at your option receive a license
http://boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt attached.
Please verify DFSG-freeness and add to
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
Thank you.
Shriramana Sharma.
Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or organization
obtaining
://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
so I am wondering whether it is OK or not. I will start a separate
thread for that.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
---
Copyright 2007, Company X, Country Y. All rights reserved.
---
will be sufficient, I will use it.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
disclaimer is still
applicable to their Professional License.
So how should I change the latest draft I sent so that the same source
files can be distributed to both GPL and Professional License users?
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
date_time library
Yes, yes -- how silly. I am running Kubuntu and have boost libraries
installed. Ergo the Boost license is DFSG-compatible.
I must check if I have rights to modify that wiki, and add the Boost
license to the approved list.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
under the GPL?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shriramana Sharma wrote:
The project developers want to distribute a single set of source files
under both the licenses. They don't want to have to maintain two
different directories with two different versions of the same files with
merely the license headers differing.
Please examine
to me that GPL 3 being DFSG free
is a very important thing regarding the future of Debian and Ubuntu.
Thanks.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A license I cooked up based somewhat on the Sleepycat license (just for
fun, though I do know about license proliferation). Those with extra
free time please check this for DFSG-freeness:
Copyright (c) __YEAR__,
Ben Finney wrote:
We check *works* for DFSG-freeness, not licenses. Please, if you just
want to play with licenses, do so on a non-Debian resource.
Apologies.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor.
thereby making GPL v3 non DFSG-free?
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? Is it that the copyright owner of Qt has
granted them special permission to license their code under those free
non-copyleft licenses? If so, isn't it necessary for legal propriety to
mention that in that page?
Thanks.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the CC-BY license is incompatible with the GPL (at least this was
true for CC-2.0 as said at http://fsf.org/licensing/licenses).
Is my view correct? I can use the CC-BY-ed database for my GPL-ed
program, right?
Thanks.
Shriramana Sharma
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is my view correct? I can use the CC-BY-ed database for my GPL-ed
program, right?
Apparently yes. Anyway, the correct criteria is not linking but being
a derived work. This case looks like mere aggregation.
It's not mere aggregation. Mere
a commercial
license to Qt then that person can also use the KDE libs to create
non-GPL-ed software based on that kdelibs/Qt combination.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to astronomy that requires latitude, longitude
and elevation of places to calculate sunrise, sunset etc. For that I
found the database from geonames.org. This database has a certain
internal format which the program will be hard-coded to utilize.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Francesco Poli wrote:
Shriramana, which category does the database you need belong to?
I do not understand which category you mean. It's a database of
latitude/longitude/elevation data for places around the globe. See
geonames.org.
P.S.: I am a debian-legal subscriber, so please do not
By the by, is CC-3.0-BY itself DFSG-free? It is not listed at
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses but since CC-1.0 is non-DFSG-free,
do I assume that CC-3.0 itself is not free?
I have not inlined or attached the text (nor started a separate thread)
since as OP my main question is not about
Paul Wise wrote:
Other packages licensed under CC-3.0-BY are in main. For example the
data in the whichwayisup game:
Is there a way to search for this licensewise? Thanks.
S:R)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rs 2.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
community,
community of users, community of FTP masters? Whatever does
members mean?
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
conflict with DFSG #5.
BTW did anyone ever visit www.dfsg.org ? (Even lighter note.)
Have a nice day, everyone.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work
and not derivative works.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
laws?
Anyway, thanks.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Halton wrote:
(IAAL but TINLA)
First time I've seen TINLA used with IAAL instead of IANAL.
:) Hello John, nice to meet you.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sean Kellogg wrote:
and apply the more vague clauses of the DFSG.
What vague clauses of the DFSG?
Shriramana.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the GPLv3 to the DFSG. There were a lot
of comments on this list at the time of draft discussion of GPL and I
did not follow them and some of the comments from that time may not
apply now - to the final GPLv3 that is.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
a Debian bug?
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
only, into
his codebase, creating 04-noqt-thirdvar.cpp, and distributes it under
the BSDL only.
Thanks.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the usage of such work
* or if the above is not possible, on another publicly accessible
^^network^^ location closely related to your activities
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not a Debian Developer.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freedoms can't the unfortunate under-evil-control author take
away? At any rate, I don't believe the tentacles of evil test would make
my Sleepycat+ASP-fix license non-DFSG-free. Please explain what exact
clause of DFSG such a license would conflict with.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
*have* such a location?
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of this
world-view. FOSS commerce will be redefined, I guess. But really, I
don't see the Linux kernel or many other GPL-ed apps going under the
AGPL, seeing as the pure-desktop usage market is still wide, and is not
going to disappear in the foreseeable future.
Shriramana Sharma
for its functioning makes it a
derivative work, and it *must* be licensed under the GPL when
distributed, whether in source form or compiled form.
Please point out the flaw in this reasoning. Thank you.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Shriramana Sharma wrote:
2. Y modifies this program to use Qt (under the GPL), creating
02-qt-nothirdvar.cpp, and distributes it under both the BSDL and GPL.
1)
Please explain how this is legal.
Qt is copyrighted by Trolltech. A license provides me rights that
normally only the copyright
for the speedy debianization of the now
DFSG-compatible Swiss Ephemeris library. (I am unable to help in this
as I am not sufficiently technically competent.)
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
16:36:40 +0200
From: Alois Treindl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello.
I have notified Debian but meanwhile got a doubt:
Could the developers please clarify
48 matches
Mail list logo
