On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 10:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:09:45PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
* The statement that the copyright license is not a trademark
license is not in conflict with the GPL, and explicitly stated
as an option
Hi Francesco,
I contacted upstream a number of times a couple of years ago, and never
got any reply.
That said, a couple of people convinced me that OCTPL is (now)
GPL-compatible, so FreeCAD is distributable, based on the following
points:
* The clause indicating You are also obliged to
Hello Mikko,
And let me thank you and CSC for being a model upstream partner in the
effort to make a high-quality Debian package for such a wonderful piece
of software. Your responsiveness, openness to patches, and willingness
to discuss license issues have all been far above and beyond any
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 21:50 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:57:40 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[...]
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 23:49 +0200, Mikko Lyly wrote:
[...]
Indeed, you're fine as far as your distribution is concerned; as far as
I can tell no GPL code in the fem
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 02:45 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:20:24PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 21:32 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 02:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Adam C Powell IV
[Sorry to let the thread drop for so long]
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 21:32 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 02:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
It depends on OpenCascade, which has a license which sounds DFSG-free
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 23:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:20:24 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[...]
Francesco, I read the Linux Today story which you linked, and don't
see how it's relevant.
It's another case where a license is interpreted by upstream
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 02:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
Greetings,
I just sent in an RFP for Salomé, a very nice and highly capable
engineering tool under LGPL.
That was my goal when I started to look at packaging OpenCascade. But
there is a lot of work
Greetings,
I just sent in an RFP for Salomé, a very nice and highly capable
engineering tool under LGPL.
It depends on OpenCascade, which has a license which sounds DFSG-free.
The license is at: http://www.opencascade.org/occ/license/
There were two discussions on the OpenCascade license last
Walter Landry wrote:
Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem: Debian Alpha is lacking a good browser
the solution: there is a version of Netscape 4.7-4
that was compiled by Compaq for Tru64; this version is
also distributed by RedHat for Alpha; some people have
passed it thru
10 matches
Mail list logo
