Hello people,
the openlayers package, which I'm reviewing for sponsorship (mentoree CCed),
has a couple of files with the following license:
---8---
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
this software and associated documentation files (the Software), to
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:43:14 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
the openlayers package, which I'm reviewing for sponsorship (mentoree
CCed), has a couple of files with the following license:
...
While I agree this license fails
Hello,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:49:35 +0100, Mark Weyer wrote:
What I am looking for:
- Copyleft with source requirement, but should not contaminate other
software.
- No additional burden on anyone. In particular no requirements for
derivatives to advertize, to not advertize, to follow
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:27:14 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Must packages in main derive the contents of binary packages from the
sources shipped in the source package,
Yes.
or can they simply copy pre-generated, not directly editable files which have
been derived using some other process
Hello *,
I'm packaging wicd for Debian, and it's licensed under GPL-2+. However, one of
its components (uninstall.sh) carries this license:
# Copyright 2008 Robby Workman [EMAIL PROTECTED], Northport, AL, USA
# Copyright 2008 Alan Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lizella, GA, USA
# All rights reserved.
#
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:19:55 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm packaging wicd for Debian, and it's licensed under GPL-2+. However, one
of its components (uninstall.sh) carries this license:
# Copyright 2008 Robby Workman [EMAIL PROTECTED], Northport
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:03:27 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:19:55 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
You're right, and [the All rights reserved clause] should best
be removed by the copyright holder. You might like to communicate
Hi,
I'd like to package a software [1], but I'm encountering possible copyright
issues. I contacted upstream to know his real name, in order to put it in
debian/copyright, but he wishes to be known as Master Kernel (that is the
name provided in the sources). Is that possible?
He also asked me
Hi *,
I'm packaging a new software for the Debian-Med group, and the source shows
this statement:
/* This code may be used and modified for non-commercial purposes*/
/* but redistribution in any form requires written permission. */
This is clearly non-DFSG-free.
I've
9 matches
Mail list logo
