Re: licensing question for nom.tam.fits

2012-12-03 Thread Florian Rothmaier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jérémy, Am 01.12.2012 12:28, schrieb Jérémy Lal: I thought public-domain wasn't DFSG (because it's not in some countries). That's interesting and something new to me. The public domain is listed on the page http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses

Re: licensing question for nom.tam.fits

2012-12-03 Thread Florian Rothmaier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Francesco, Charles and Kuno, thank you very much for your helpful answers and clarifications! I didn't receive Kuno's original mail (maybe because there was no CC to me) but I hope that I got the relevant parts from the quoted paragraphs (his

Re: licensing question for nom.tam.fits

2012-11-30 Thread Florian Rothmaier
are in the public domain? Best regards, Florian Am 28.08.2012 19:19, schrieb Francesco Poli: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:37:46 +0200 Florian Rothmaier wrote: Hi to everyone involved in debian-legal, Hello! I've got a licensing issue related to the astronomical Java library fits (nom.tam.fits

Re: licensing question for nom.tam.fits

2012-08-30 Thread Florian Rothmaier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Francesco! Am 28.08.2012 19:19, schrieb Francesco Poli: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:37:46 +0200 Florian Rothmaier wrote: Hi to everyone involved in debian-legal, Hello! I've got a licensing issue related to the astronomical Java library

licensing question for nom.tam.fits

2012-08-28 Thread Florian Rothmaier
Hi to everyone involved in debian-legal, I've got a licensing issue related to the astronomical Java library fits (nom.tam.fits) from Thomas McGlynn. The newest release can be obtained at: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/fits/java/v1.0/v1.08.1/ . In the code, I find the following