the readline module,
would that be better than (2) ?
(2c) If the installation of python2.1-ssl would remove the readline
module, that should definitely satisfy the GPL, correct ?
(3) Link _socket.so with GnuTLS instead of OpenSSl. I don't know how
feasible this is.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 10:04:31PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020505 20:33]:
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 07:40:59PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
A few questions:
(1) How about this: I ship two versions of _socket.so in the python2.1
package: One
which should be linked with
gcc by the user to make the Objective-C compiler. IIRC that wasn't
legal and they GPL'd the source to comply with the GPL. This is only
from my vague memory, so there is a change that this isn't totally
correct. :)
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http
link libreadline with openssl and that isn't ok.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpqHdkV1cOuZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. The European industry also has a
lot of money at stake in software-related RD (all the
software in DVD players and mobile phones, for example).
Software patents is the biggest threat for free software and we should
*never* support them.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:57:21PM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:52:58AM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Stephen Zander wrote:
I don't believe the US will ever stop supporting softare patents;
there's too much money
personally don't believe non-US is going away until the entire world
suports software patents.
I hope you mean when the US doesn't support software pantents
anymore here.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http
in the US,
why can't it go into non-US/main?
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpDiDpBPOmlF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:52:53AM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:06:59PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
DSS and IDEA are both patented in Europe, so putting it in non-us
won't help.
If I'm right, patents on software aren't
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:18:15PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Jeroen == Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeroen I hope you mean when the US doesn't support software
Jeroen pantents anymore here.
No, I meant what I said. While at least one country in the world
refuses
not contaminate other software, etc. The idea behind the
DFSG doesn't differ for books, but the current implementation does
only talk about software.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
be possible to convince them to make the RFCs
free. But I don't have enough time to do that.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpkD2DGbnubw.pgp
Description: PGP
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:57:40AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:31:58PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
However, I don't see why that should give much problems. You don't
want to change to standards anyhow.
I would.
For example, I would take some of the RFC's
that is useful to be able to modify
the document. If there is such a case that would change my opinion,
but I don't see it at the moment.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
