Re: zstd: PATENTS application to copyright

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Jeff Epler writes: > >> Apparently, >> https://github.com/facebook/zstd >> https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/LICENSE >> https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/PATENTS > > Thank you for

zstd: PATENTS application to copyright

Hi there, I cannot find any older thread discussing zstd being in the main section of Debian, so I am raising the subject just for later reference. Could someone please confirm this is acceptable for main, in particular the section: "The license granted hereunder will terminate, ", see below

OpenJDK 7.0 license question

[CC me please] Hi there, Could someone please clarify why OpenJDK 7.0 went to main with the following license: http://openjdk.java.net/legal/ - http://openjdk.java.net/legal/OpenJDK-TCK_SE7_27Dec2011.pdf ... 1.1 “Compatible Licensee Implementation” means a Licensee Implementation that (i)

Sun Microsystems, Inc. Binary Code License Agreement

Hi, I recently received a report that jai-* packages may not be compatible with debian non-free. Specifically I am looking at jai-core's MEDIALIB FOR JAI/SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS section 2: ... 2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to the license granted in Section 1 (Software

Re: public domain no modification: Expat

FYI, upstream agreed to change the pseudo public domain license into an MIT one (expat): http://math.hws.edu/javamath/ Thanks everyone for comments/suggestions. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote: On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:10:26 -0700 Steve Langasek

public domain no modification

Hi all, I am working on the package for Java Components for Mathematics (#667923). Some files are distributed with a clear public domain type license: This source code file, and compiled classes derived from it, can be used and distributed without restriction, including for commercial use.

JPEG-LS license issue

[ Sorry for the duplicate, I sent the initial post to debian-devel, but was suggested this mailing list instead. So -again- could someone please help me figure out the following issue.] I am trying to understand some license issue I am having. Could someone let me know if the following is