Re: What are the tests? was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: MongoDB Server Side Public License, Version 1 (SSPL v1)

https://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html Beware these are proxy cases for dfsg criteria and not criteria themselves. Paul On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 8:48 AM Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) < cem.f.karan@mail.mil> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 5:47 PM, Xavier wrote: > >Le

Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible

pabs is right. This would fail On Oct 4, 2016 9:45 AM, "Yaroslav Halchenko" wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > > // 4. If anything other than configuration, indentation or comments > have been >

Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version

Hi, Kim Paflias, I believe you might want the following to contact Apple's legal department. https://www.apple.com/legal/contact/ On Mar 27, 2016 4:54 PM, "Kim Paflias" wrote: > I don't understand all this licensing information but if I have the right > to refuse it in

Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself

FWIW, I've been rejecting them where I see them. Mind filing serious bugs on those 11? Paul On Mar 20, 2016 11:32 AM, "Mattia Rizzolo" wrote: > [ please CC me as I'm not in d-legal@ ] > > So, today I discovered [0] that R-project has some polices regarding > licenses [1]. In

Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries

Have a link to 3-4 such webpages I can take a look at? Paul On Jan 15, 2016 2:47 AM, "Hendrik Weimer" wrote: > Charles Plessy writes: > > > so you wrote on your blog six years ago that distributing works done by > US > > government institutions is "a

Re: GPL + question

That's literally what I said. d/copyright is for source not binary. On May 29, 2015 8:42 AM, Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote: I just had a discussion with an ftp-master who rejected one of my packages. The package in question is missfits. It contains

Re: GPL + question

Or a CLA. Or breaking copyright law. Or modified the work and distribute it under a superset of the old terms. Or or or :) For the record; I don't believe Apple is breaking copyright law, and I didn't mean to imply that :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Free as in speech, but not as in beer

On Mar 24, 2015 1:17 PM, Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:42:08PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, Is there in Debian room for a program what's free as in speech (AGPL) but not as in beer? Debian contains software in main which is covered by the

Re: AGPL request for summary of recent discussion

On Aug 27, 2013 8:15 AM, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote: Hi, there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB. I was unable to follow them totally and remember there being raised at least two points: • The inability to