the first step should be to ask upstream to clarify / fix the
README. Have you tried that? What was their response?
Though even if some parts are GPLv2-only and some are GPLv2-or-later,
GPLv2-only is sufficient for debian.
-- Kuno.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
://dev.saxonica.com/repos/archive/opensource/latest9.4/data/w3c/
I think most of these files are already in the w3c-dtd-xhtml package,
have you looked at that?
Regards,
Kuno Woudt.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
patents which are owned by the copyright
holder(s)), or don't mention patents at all, in which case you may be
able to argue in court that a patent license was implied.
-- Kuno.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
is which license should be chosen in the case that
the sources are in the public domain?
CC0 is the closest you can get to public domain, while still giving out
a valid license for those jurisdictions where public domain doesn't work.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
-- kuno / warp
GPL
includes terms and conditions substantially equivalent to those of this
license.
So, if you wish to use the AGPL, you as copyright holder can choose
between AGPLv1 and AGPLv1 or later. But whichever you choose, you
cannot remove the option to 'upgrade' to GNU GPLv3.
-- Kuno.
(ps
5 matches
Mail list logo