On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead:
This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they
just decided to get CC 4.0 out of the door first, and the
current CC0 version is *explicitly* discouraged for use
with software. (Also, Public
Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead:
This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they
just decided to get CC 4.0 out of the door first, and the
current CC0
On 28.11.2013 13:27, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead:
This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they
just decided to get CC 4.0 out of
kuno at frob.nl writes:
On 28.11.2013 13:27, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead:
This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they
just
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 10:01 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/40768
Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead:
http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2013/11/25/upgrade-to-0/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/40768
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
6 matches
Mail list logo