Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they just decided to get CC 4.0 out of the door first, and the current CC0 version is *explicitly* discouraged for use with software. (Also, Public

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they just decided to get CC 4.0 out of the door first, and the current CC0

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread kuno
On 28.11.2013 13:27, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they just decided to get CC 4.0 out of

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread Mike Linksvayer
kuno at frob.nl writes: On 28.11.2013 13:27, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they just

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 10:01 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/40768 Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2013/11/25/upgrade-to-0/ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a

Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-26 Thread Paul Wise
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/40768 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part