Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-02-07 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:04:14 +, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scripsit Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] *D R A F T* Debian licence summary of the Common Public License version 1.0 For the record, I'm withdrawing this draft. I still think it is a reasonable accurate

Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-02-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:25:32 + Henning Makholm wrote: We'll want IBM or ATT to fix the license before the consensus changes to consider the license bugs non-free, though. As I said, the ideal solution would be to persuade IBM to publish a new and better version of the CPL (thus exploiting

Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-02-07 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:25:32 + Henning Makholm wrote: We'll want IBM or ATT to fix the license before the consensus changes to consider the license bugs non-free, though. As I said, the ideal solution would be to persuade IBM to publish a new

Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-02-06 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] *D R A F T* Debian licence summary of the Common Public License version 1.0 For the record, I'm withdrawing this draft. I still think it is a reasonable accurate description of the consensus, but I have been convinced that aiming for

Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-01-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] *D R A F T* Debian licence summary of the Common Public License version 1.0 I suppose the lack of response implies that nobody agrees with my summary. Please indicate why: [ ] What a load of drivel! You're trying to

Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-01-25 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:47:19PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] *D R A F T* Debian licence summary of the Common Public License version 1.0 I suppose the lack of response implies that nobody agrees with my summary. Please indicate why:

Re: Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-01-25 Thread MJ Ray
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scripsit Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] *D R A F T* Debian licence summary of the Common Public License version 1.0 I suppose the lack of response implies that nobody agrees with my summary. Please indicate why: [ ] What a load of

Draft: Graphviz summary

2005-01-21 Thread Henning Makholm
The discussion of the new Graphviz license sort of petered out, but I think there is a widespread interest into reaching a conclusion. Therefore, I'm trying to ferret out dissent by the ancient and venerable tactic of asserting that a consensus exists: *D R A F T* Debian licence summary of