License question for new package

Hello - I'm packaging something new that has a custom license, and I'd an official opinion as to which repo it can go it: Platinum Arts Sandbox is a product of Platinum Arts LLC. Product Webpage: http://SandboxGameMaker.com Platinum Arts LLC Homepage (adults only) - http://PlatinumArts.Net

Re: License question for new package

Hi, Have a look at this part: With the exception of content with an individual readme file, all content is copyright Platinum Arts LLC and permission is required for distribution. It is not even valid for non-free without an special permission. My approach for this package was to package te game

Re: License question for new package

Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com writes: Hello - I'm packaging something new that has a custom license, and I'd an official opinion as to which repo it can go it: Thank you for your attention to this topic, and for quoting the license text here for inspection. Overall, the language is poor

Re: License question for new package

Thanks Miry for the reply! On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote: Have a look at this part: With the exception of content with an individual readme file, all content is copyright Platinum Arts LLC and permission is required for distribution. It is not even valid

Re: License question for new package

Le Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:23:26PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : Obnoxious advertising requirement: IMO this restriction makes the work non-free for the same reasons the similar requirement in the original BSD license makes a work non-free. Hello everybody, works licenced with advertisement