On 10/03/2012 01:23, Ben Finney wrote:
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes:
On 09/03/2012 23:14, Ben Finney wrote:
On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of
Debian Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's
Le Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:34:10PM +0100, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
In the latest version, Author has been replaced by Original Author,
and that term defined in the copyright line :
https://raw.github.com/isaacs/npm/master/LICENSE
Dear Jérémy,
this clause is quite similar to the clause 6c of the
On 24/01/2012 15:24, MJ Ray wrote:
Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
is it still DFSG ?
If it just this one addition:
Distributions of all or part of the Software intended to be used
by the recipients as they would use the unmodified Software,
On 12-03-09 at 04:34pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
* it is really easy to comply with this license.
* the bug-reporting contacts can be changed easily
* they don't need to be changed anyway, the npm debian package won't need
any patch (i mean the one being prepared, version 1.1.x, not the one in sid,
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes:
On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian
Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The
fact that npm is not in the distro is worse for the distro than it
is
On 09/03/2012 23:14, Ben Finney wrote:
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes:
On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian
Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The
fact that npm is not in the distro
On 03/09/2012 05:44 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org writes:
On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian
Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The
fact that npm is not in the
Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
is it still DFSG ?
If it just this one addition:
Distributions of all or part of the Software intended to be used
by the recipients as they would use the unmodified Software,
containing modifications that
Jérémy Lal, 2012-01-24 01:55+0100:
I will, and concur. But knowing upstream i can tell he'll need stronger
arguments.
The 3-clause BSD license would seem to be appropriate considering what
the author apparently wants.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:51:44 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
License proliferation is bad, please help get rid of it by asking
upstream to switch to a standard license.
Fully agreed.
I would
Hi,
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
is it still DFSG ?
Regards,
Jérémy.
MIT +no-false-attribs License
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
files (the Software), to deal in the Software
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
License proliferation is bad, please help get rid of it by asking
upstream to switch to a standard license.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 24/01/2012 01:51, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
License proliferation is bad, please help get rid of it by asking
upstream to switch to a standard license.
I will, and concur. But knowing upstream i
Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com writes:
On 24/01/2012 01:51, Paul Wise wrote:
License proliferation is bad, please help get rid of it by asking
upstream to switch to a standard license.
I will, and concur. But knowing upstream i can tell he'll need
stronger arguments.
If “license
14 matches
Mail list logo
