On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:52:38 -0500 Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Francesco Poli dijo [Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200]:
but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
considering these file types
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:56:55 -0500 Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I am not convinced: if someone releases a work under the GPL without
making the corresponding source available, nobody else really has the
true permission
Francesco Poli dijo [Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200]:
but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
considering these file types as source code for the relevant purposes under
the
flattened image
or music file in the archive complies with it.
* Does distributing wesnoth-music without source code comply with its
license (GPL 2+)?
This might be seen a bit more problematic (but still not wesnoth
specific), though you write:
There was some discussion about this problem
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:58:59 -0500 Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
[...]
but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
considering
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I am not convinced: if someone releases a work under the GPL without
making the corresponding source available, nobody else really has the
true permission to redistribute, as the license requires
re-distributors to make source
only applied to programs, but later firmware, documentation and other materials
were also included. Does DFSG (and, specifically, its requirement of having
source code included) apply to music?
* Does distributing wesnoth-music without source code comply with its license
(GPL 2+)?
There was some
and for adaption to different
requirements (e.g. using musical instruments matching the theme of a campaign
(tribal/medieval/SF)).
* Does distributing wesnoth-music without source code comply with its license
(GPL 2+)?
No. The copyright holders can distribute their own work in any way they like
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
* Does distributing wesnoth-music without source code comply with its
license (GPL 2+)?
No. The copyright holders can distribute their own work in any way they like,
No discussion here...
but anybody else breaches the GPL 2
9 matches
Mail list logo
