Hi FTP masters,
Now that the archive is frozen, could you please take some time to
review this discussion?
Thanks,
Lucas
On 09/10/14 at 13:46 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 08/10/14 at 12:17 +0200, Mateusz Jończyk wrote:
W dniu 21.08.2014 o 20:08, Lucas Nussbaum pisze:
Hi,
Hi,
On 08/10/14 at 12:17 +0200, Mateusz Jończyk wrote:
W dniu 21.08.2014 o 20:08, Lucas Nussbaum pisze:
Hi,
First, thanks a lot to Ian for working on this draft, which (I think)
provides a nice summary of the situation around the PHP license.
[snip]
That's indeed a very good
W dniu 21.08.2014 o 20:08, Lucas Nussbaum pisze:
Hi,
First, thanks a lot to Ian for working on this draft, which (I think)
provides a nice summary of the situation around the PHP license.
[snip]
That's indeed a very good point, which I already raised with Ian earlier
this month.
Draft question for SFLC:
(there are no changes since v3 apart from fixes to the numbering of
some section cross-references)
Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP
licence. These worries are dismissed by other members and by relevant
upstreams. We would like some
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (2014-08-21):
Draft question for SFLC:
(there are no changes since v3 apart from fixes to the numbering of
some section cross-references)
Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP
licence. These worries are dismissed
Cyril Brulebois writes (Re: PHP licence SFLC questions draft v4):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (2014-08-21):
We are concerned here with the PHP 3.01 Licences, which can be
found here: http://php.net/license/3_01.txt
I might have missed them, but I don't think there were any
Hi,
First, thanks a lot to Ian for working on this draft, which (I think)
provides a nice summary of the situation around the PHP license.
On 21/08/14 at 19:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk (2014-08-21):
Draft question for SFLC:
(there are no
7 matches
Mail list logo
