Henning Makholm wrote:
No, because the quoted license explicitly allows the distribution of
binaries built from modified sources. That kind of patch-clause
licenses is specifically blessed by DFSG #4.
OK. I think understand. qmail and pine are non-free because they
disallow binary distribution,
Scripsit Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK. I think understand. qmail and pine are non-free because they
disallow binary distribution, period. gnuplot can go into main since
the Debian project distributes sources as a .orig.tar.gz and a .diff.gz
(except for native Debian packages
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:36:02 + Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
* 3. provide your name and address as the primary contact for
*the support of your modified version, and
[...]
No, because the quoted license explicitly allows the
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* 3. provide your name and address as the primary contact for
*the support of your modified version, and
The above quoted clause worries me a bit, though.
Identifying yourself seems to be a necessary condition for distributing
modified
While looking at the gnuplot documentation (trying to figure out
how to make a bar graph) I came across this in the FAQ:
1.6 Legalities
Gnuplot is freeware authored by a collection of volunteers, who cannot
make any legal statement about the compliance or non-compliance of
gnuplot or its uses.
5 matches
Mail list logo