Hi
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:30:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Harald Jenny
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote:
Ok so Petr's and my stanza should be marked BSD-like for correctness?
Yep.
Ok thanks for this clarification and the valuable input.
--
Hello Paul
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:43:48AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Harald Jenny
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote:
please CC me when replying, thanks.
Sorry, used to things being the other way
No problem I did not request it explicitly so it was my
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Harald Jenny
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote:
Ok so Petr's and my stanza should be marked BSD-like for correctness?
Yep.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi Charles
could you please CC me on reply? Thanks
Le Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:16:26AM +0100, Harald Jenny a écrit :
I also thought about this but as the license text for the University of
California differes slightly from the one of Petr Rehor I wasn't sure this
is
the correct way
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Harald Jenny
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote:
please CC me when replying, thanks.
Sorry, used to things being the other way
Thanks and could you also comment on Charles Plessy's last mail concerning the
BSD-like case?
I agree with Charles here.
--
bye,
Dear Paul Wise
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:17:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Harald Jenny
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote:
the package was made by me so yes I could change the license of the whole
debian directory (minus the upstream patch) to BSD (I guess
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:57:43PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear Harald,
Dear Charles Plessy
note that you can simplify your copyright file like this:
Format: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
Upstream-Name: amavisd-milter
Upstream-Contact: Petr Rehor r...@rx.cz
Source:
Le Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:16:26AM +0100, Harald Jenny a écrit :
I also thought about this but as the license text for the University of
California differes slightly from the one of Petr Rehor I wasn't sure this is
the correct way to do it - I also thought about:
Oops, I missed this as the
Dear Paul Wise,
the package was made by me so yes I could change the license of the whole
debian directory (minus the upstream patch) to BSD (I guess this is what you
referred to) but the main question for me is if this is the course of action
which I should take (versus just keeping a different
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Harald Jenny
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote:
the package was made by me so yes I could change the license of the whole
debian directory (minus the upstream patch) to BSD (I guess this is what you
referred to) but the main question for me is if this is the
Dear mailing list users,
I maintain a package which is licensed under a 3-clause BSD license while my
debian directory is currently licensed under the GPL-2+, as I've picked up a
patch from the next upstream release I also made a seperate paragraph for this
patch
If you are the copyright holder on all the GPL-2+ files, then yes you
can change the license on them.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
