On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 at 14:06:49 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I don't see a need to specify “data”. What's wrong with “work”, the term
normally seen in English-language copyright discussions for any
information covered by copyright?
Since the issue under discussion is things that might or might not
Hi Debian Legal Experts,
N.B. yes -- I use 'experts', and you do not have to be certified, nor a
diplomaed attorney. Since everything is relative, you might just have
an expertise I am lacking, thus being experts for my sake. Enjoy the
title ;-)
In the light of my veiled (never said here
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 at 10:44:34 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Should I advise to blindly attach a copyright statement and
license, possibly copyrighting non-copyrightable, thus committing
Copyfraud in some jurisdictions?
I'm not a lawyer or anything, but would this work?
To the extent
Le Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:44:34AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
Or should I advise to use the text of MIT license, verbally and
explicitly describing possible uses and disclaiming any warranty?
but once again without any copyright statement.
Dear Yaroslav,
licenses of the family of
4 matches
Mail list logo
