On Sat, Apr 14, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
I would rather suggest a license more in line with public domain
works, such as Creative Commons zero license, the SQLite public
domain dedication, or the GNU all-permissive license.
For software works, I don't think this group should
Dear Niall and Gürkan,
I'll adopt[0] the foremost package and I would like to know what licence have
you
granted to the work you've made (debian/* files). I'm trying to upgrade
d/copyright to a machine readable format[1].
If you don't have any complains, I think we should grant a GPL-3+
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:33:06PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi,
I see [1] that the package is currently public domain, except for a
couple of files, which are instead copyrighted and released under the
terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later.
[1]
Le Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:33:06PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:36:22 -0300 Raúl Benencia wrote:
I see [1] that the package is currently public domain, except for a
couple of files, which are instead copyrighted and released under the
terms of the GNU GPL v2 or
4 matches
Mail list logo
