Charles Plessy wrote:
it would be much more productive if this scenario would be accompanied with
some data and facts about which law in which country make the non-warranty
disclaimer necessary, exemplified by cases where these laws have successfully
been used in court by the plaintiff.
Here
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:50:00 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
It is the addition of extra clauses and vague disclaimers that sometimes
make
licenses non-free (clauses like ‘do not kill people with my software’), so
let's resist to temptation of making our license
Hi!
Am 27.06.2010 15:13, schrieb Ben Finney:
[ SVG logo without no warranty waiver ]
This does seem to be a valid concern. The SVG standard allows for
documents to contain executable code for animation with ECMAScript
URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/animate.html#DOMAnimationExample.
So that
Hi!
Am 29.06.2010 14:49, schrieb Ben Finney:
[ SVG logo without no warranty waiver ]
I think it would be prudent to add a warranty disclaimer like those
found in Expat license terms or similar.
Why do we need a warranty waiver for a feature, we don't actually use?
Because we also allow
Hello,
I understand the fact this feature isn't currently used and sounds like
FUD, but why such a clause does exist for the logo without Debian? It
assumes that in case of damages implying the use of the logo, the Debian
Project do not provide any warranty like for any software as well as it
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 21:12:24 +0200, Pompee William wrote:
Hello,
I understand the fact this feature isn't currently used and sounds
like FUD, but why such a clause does exist for the logo without
Debian? It
assumes that in case of damages implying the use of the logo, the Debian
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:58:13 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 21:12:24 +0200, Pompee William wrote:
Hello,
I understand the fact this feature isn't currently used and sounds
like FUD, but why such a clause does exist for the logo without
Debian? It
assumes that
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info writes:
I still don't understand. Is it prudent to have such a clause, because
someone else could embed a bad script, to be sure we are safe?
That's what I'm saying. As I see it, the potential for legal confusion
over who is implicitly
Le Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:31:52AM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
I assume “how could that happen” there refers to the legal confusion. I
don't pretend to be an expert, but “The Debian project is a major
copyright holder in this work which caused damage to our systems, and
there's no warranty
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
it would be much more productive if this scenario would be accompanied
with some data and facts about which law in which country make the
non-warranty disclaimer necessary, exemplified by cases where these
laws have successfully been used in court by
Hi!
On #debian-www will raised concerns that there might be issues with
respect to our logo license for including the debian lettering. It
doesn't contain a warranty waiver, and given that we publish svg images
which could contain potential harmful scripting (from will's
interpretation,
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:29:48 +0200 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Hello!
On #debian-www will raised concerns that there might be issues with
respect to our logo license for including the debian lettering. It
doesn't contain a warranty waiver,
If I understand correctly, the concern is
Hello,
I agree with your proposal to do nothing to protect the Debian trademark
under the copyright law using the DOULL since the trademark is
automatically protected under the trademark law and we should enforce it
by this mean only.
Regards
Pompee William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
13 matches
Mail list logo
