Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 16:01:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
You may not impose any further restrictions with respect to the *rights
granted by the GPL*. But there are already such restrictions, and you
cannot remove them because you are not the
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:06:01 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
There's another issue with the remaining four songs, though.
Is their source available?
I mean: what's the preferred form[1] for making modifications to the
songs? Is this form
--- Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
We must determine what is the preferred form for making modifications to
the song. I'm not sure an Ogg Vorbis + MIDI form qualifies...
I think that's quite complex to decide on a single-game basis, as that
decision might affect most of other
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], MJ Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 16:01:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
You may not impose any further restrictions with respect to the *rights
granted by the GPL*. But there are already such
On Sun, 13 May 2007 21:04:09 +0100 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], MJ Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[...]
The copyright holder could make a new licence out of the GPL, as
permitted by the FSF, but they have not done so. I think they should
use the plain GPL, because
On Sun, 13 May 2007 19:11:32 +0200 (CEST) Miriam Ruiz wrote:
--- Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
We must determine what is the preferred form for making
modifications to the song. I'm not sure an Ogg Vorbis + MIDI form
qualifies...
I think that's quite complex to decide
Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], MJ Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Adding any restrictions to plain GPL results in an invalid licence
as in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/05/msg00303.html
I think you're wrong here ... (certainly if the
7 matches
Mail list logo
