On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 02:40:25PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Stefano just mentioned that it would be better to CC him if we want
something to be done to do something. So here we go.
Thanks Joss for the Cc, as I'm not subscribed to -legal (so please keep
the Cc on replies).
I've read the
Hi,
Josselin Mouette a écrit :
A trademark is a trademark. If we don’t enforce it, we lose it.
Absolutly but I believe that the swirl is not include in the Debian's
trademark.
So, currently, the blue swirl could only be a copyright violation.
Bye,
--
Arnaud Fouquaut
http://arno.skamp.eu.org
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
As far as I can tell (IANAL, and before contacting SPI lawyer) what we
should ask Legend PC is then to come into compliance of the license, by
mentioning copyright and permission notices.
But copyright doesn't apply to independent invention, which
Hi,
Le 30/11/10 23:46, Ken Arromdee a écrit :
But copyright doesn't apply to independent invention, which he claims this
is, and which seems fairly reasonable. If he independently invented it we
only have a trademark claim; if we don't have a trademark claim we have
none.
IANAL, but as far
4 matches
Mail list logo
