On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”?
Le Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
What other
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:45:39 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a
“copy”?
Why not? I personally think that a compiled
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”?
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
What other term would you use to describe the compiled thing?
It is my
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a
“copy”?
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
There's little to
4 matches
Mail list logo