Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?

2009-07-04 Thread Charles Plessy
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”? Le Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit : Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is indeed a copy. What other

Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?

2009-07-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:45:39 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes: On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: [...] Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”? Why not? I personally think that a compiled

Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?

2009-07-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: [...] Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”? Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is indeed a copy. What other term would you use to describe the compiled thing? It is my

Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?

2009-07-03 Thread Ben Finney
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes: On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: [...] Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”? Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is indeed a copy. There's little to