Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 16:01:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
You may not impose any further restrictions with respect to the *rights
granted by the GPL*. But there are already such restrictions, and you
cannot remove them because you are not the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], MJ Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 16:01:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
You may not impose any further restrictions with respect to the *rights
granted by the GPL*. But there are already such
On Sun, 13 May 2007 21:04:09 +0100 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], MJ Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[...]
The copyright holder could make a new licence out of the GPL, as
permitted by the FSF, but they have not done so. I think they should
use the plain GPL, because
Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], MJ Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Adding any restrictions to plain GPL results in an invalid licence
as in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/05/msg00303.html
I think you're wrong here ... (certainly if the
On Sat, 12 May 2007 20:52:05 +0100 (BST) Alan Baghumian wrote:
[...]
You can find the exact license here:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-fonts/packages/ttf-liberation/trunk/debian/copyright?op=filerev=0sc=0
Mmmmh, does the following exception constitute an additional
restriction with respect
On Saturday 12 May 2007 13:30:43 Francesco Poli wrote:
Mmmmh, does the following exception constitute an additional
restriction with respect to the GNU GPL v2?
| (b) As a further exception, any distribution of the object code of the
| Software in a physical product must provide you the
On Sat, 12 May 2007 13:55:23 -0600 Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 13:30:43 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
If this is the case, the work could be even undistributable, because
it's licensed under inconsistent[1] terms (GPLv2 + additional
restrictions).
What do other
On Saturday 12 May 2007 16:01:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
You may not impose any further restrictions with respect to the *rights
granted by the GPL*. But there are already such restrictions, and you
cannot remove them because you are not the copyright holder.
Hence you cannot comply with the
Wesley J. Landaker writes:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 16:01:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
You may not impose any further restrictions with respect to the *rights
granted by the GPL*. But there are already such restrictions, and you
cannot remove them because you are not the copyright holder.
Hence
9 matches
Mail list logo
