Re: Please consider a free license for tRNAscan-SE

Dear Todd, Dear Patricia, As a member of the Debian Med team, I have been working on updating tRNAscan-SE to version 2.0.7 for the Debian project. However, I initially overlooked that there was still a file src/dbmalloc.h with a non-free copyright statement. I understand there were discussions,

[RFS] trnascan-se 2.0.7+ds-1

Hi again, After a few hiccups with build options then the changelog, I pushed an update of trnascan-se, version 2.0.7+ds-1, on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/trnascan-se I believe the package should be ready for update. Please feel free to review it and either upload or grant

Re: Salsa CI

Hi Bálint, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:16:40PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi, > > As I see the Med Team has a policy [1] on configuring CI on Salsa, but > CI is not turned on on all projects (like for xenium). > > IMO all projects on Salsa should take advantage of CI and I'd like to > propose

Salsa CI

Hi, As I see the Med Team has a policy [1] on configuring CI on Salsa, but CI is not turned on on all projects (like for xenium). IMO all projects on Salsa should take advantage of CI and I'd like to propose turning it on for all Debian Med packages either one by one or en masse in coordination

Re: +nim-kexpr Re: RFS+peer review: nim-lapper

On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 00:33, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hello again, > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/nim-kexpr It was an empty binary package: * Installed nim file * Simply installing nim file wasn't enough - it can't execute without importing the functions from corresponding c file - so I

Re: [RFS] python-ete3 3.1.2+dfsg-2

Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-11-04 20:24:37 +0100: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:32:40PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > You can grant me DM permissions if you think it would make sense > > for the maintenance of the package. > > Upload permissions granted - thanks a lot for your work,

Re: [RFS] python-ete3 3.1.2+dfsg-2

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:32:40PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > You can grant me DM permissions if you think it would make sense > for the maintenance of the package. Upload permissions granted - thanks a lot for your work, Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: RFS+peer review: nim-lapper

Hi, On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 23:32, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hello, > > It builds in cowbuilder this time. :o/ > It is mostly perfect. Just added: * upstream/metadata * Enabled Autopkgtests Btw, should this not "depend" upon nim? I see this in depends across other nim* packages although I'm not

Re: RFS+peer review: nim-lapper

Thank you, Étienne, I'll then just upload. Best, Steffen On 04.11.20 20:01, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > Steffen Möller, on 2020-11-04 19:02:36 +0100: >> It builds in cowbuilder this time. :o/ > Not sure for the others, but past the lovely wording game with > the package description

+nim-kexpr Re: RFS+peer review: nim-lapper

Hello again, with https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/nim-lapper and https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/nim-kexpr we likely have the last build-dependencies for the hts-nim-tools, which is another runtime-dep of bcbio. For kexpr I still expect to get input on the license of the original kexpr

Re: RFS+peer review: nim-lapper

Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-11-04 19:02:36 +0100: > It builds in cowbuilder this time. :o/ Not sure for the others, but past the lovely wording game with the package description that I pushed, reported by lintian, I see no matter to complain. I also checked copyright statements and have

[RFS] python-ete3 3.1.2+dfsg-2

Greetings, In order to address #972983, I brought a few changes to the package src:python-ete3. Changes are available on Salsa for review, and maybe upload: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 The package is lintian clean, except for a few pedantic markers. You can grant me

RFS+peer review: nim-lapper

Hello, It builds in cowbuilder this time. :o/ Many thanks Steffen

Re: ORCA

On 03.11.20 08:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:36:00AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: >> I had a second look. Impressive. Seems like linuxbrew has evolved >> enormously. > If you had a look could you please give a short summary? For me it > sounds like

done Re: [RFS] concurrentqueue

thanks! On 04.11.20 14:16, Nilesh Patra wrote: > dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com > --allow  concurrentqueue

[RFS] concurrentqueue

gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/concurrentqueue OR dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com --allow concurrentqueue Thanks and Regards Nilesh

Done Re: [RFS] pizzly

Done. On 04.11.20 11:01, Nilesh Patra wrote: > dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com > --allow  pizzly

[RFS] pizzly

gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pizzly OR dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com --allow pizzly Thanks and Regards Nilesh