; 26.01 sys, 1289888 out
> aghermann_1.1.2-1~nd16.10+1_i386.build FAILED 2:46.31 real, 103.70 user,
> 19.59 sys, 1476272 out
> aghermann_1.1.2-1~nd16.10+1_amd64.build FAILED 2:50.67 real, 98.16 user,
> 24.29 sys, 1546360 out
>
>
> http://neuro.debian.net/_files/_buildlogs/ag
, Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@onerussian.com> wrote:
> On November 14, 2016 1:27:57 PM PST, andrei zavada <johnhom...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>Ok, that's enough trouble for today. I was half-heartedly considering
>>doing some work towards 2.0.4, and now it seems all the more
Hi Yaroslav!
Here's a new upstream version of aghermann with a fix for, hard as it is to
believe, a NULL pointer dereference, and a small usability fix. Grab a dsc file
here:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_1.0.9-1.dsc.
As I see on my QA page, the version
Hi Yaroslav,
I have a new version of aghermann, with another gtk3 regression fix,
for you to kindly upload. The dsc is here:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_1.0.6-1.dsc
Upstream has not been particularly active in recent times, content to
wait another half-year
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:30:11 -1000
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
That is great. I would still prefer sponsor requests with dsc on mentors
and touch git only for minor changes
...and, here's the dsc:
On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:17:39 +0200
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
I just realise that I would not have won. Andrei, I understand that
Yaroslav will step in. If you want me to sponsor could you please in
future be so kind to follow the Git layout proposed in Debian Med policy
by using
Hi Andreas,
As my trusty sponsor Yaroslav seems to have been preoccupied by other
matters since some weeks ago, could you please stand in his stead and push
the button for my package? There's a fix for some unfortunate regression on
GTK3's part which screws the font sizes (they were rendered at
I have no strong opinion on either. Whatever you choose.
On 21 April 2015 at 12:56, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:27:39PM +0300, Andrei Zavada wrote:
---
libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libMems
/source/deb/aghermann_1.0.4-1.dsc).
Cheers,
Andrei
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:11:31 +0200
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Andrei,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:27:37PM +0300, Andrei Zavada wrote:
Below are two patches, one for the error you have hit and another for a
typical -Wformat
---
libMems/Aligner.cpp | 2 +-
libMems/Aligner.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libMems/Aligner.cpp b/libMems/Aligner.cpp
index 2fa6ee2..d3928e4 100644
--- a/libMems/Aligner.cpp
+++ b/libMems/Aligner.cpp
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ public:
---
libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c b/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c
index 4c99215..2cbfa7e 100644
--- a/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c
+++ b/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ int InitdmSML( long working_mb, long
Hi Andreas,
Below are two patches, one for the error you have hit and another for a
typical -Wformat warning this package is sure to hit when built for Debian.
Incidentally, I found that upstream chose to discards a building user
CXXFLAGS, which will flag a lintian warning (it's a concern to
---
libMems/Aligner.cpp | 2 +-
libMems/Aligner.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libMems/Aligner.cpp b/libMems/Aligner.cpp
index 2fa6ee2..d3928e4 100644
--- a/libMems/Aligner.cpp
+++ b/libMems/Aligner.cpp
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ public:
---
libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c b/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c
index 4c99215..2cbfa7e 100644
--- a/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c
+++ b/libMems/dmSML/dmsort.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ int InitdmSML( long working_mb, long
Hi Andreas,
Below are two patches, one for the error you have hit and another for a
typical -Wformat warning this package is sure to hit when built for Debian.
Incidentally, I found that upstream chose to discards a building user
CXXFLAGS, which will flag a lintian warning (it's a concern to
Hi Yaroslav,
I see some red ink appearing on my QA page, this time suggesting to avoid
using __DATE__ and __TIME__ macros in order to ensure reproducible builds:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsFromCPPMacros.
To address this, I have made appropriate changes to aghermann,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:01:58 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, andrei zavada wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
I see some red ink appearing on my QA page, this time suggesting to avoid
using __DATE__ and __TIME__ macros in order to ensure reproducible builds
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:23:20 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, andrei zavada wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:59:24 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, andrei zavada wrote:
I am investigating
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:18:03 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
Hi Andrei,
jessie is frozen now, so all new versions (instead of critical/serious
bugfixes) should go into experimental (and sure thing I Will push this
one to neurodebian to replace prev version). So start
Hi Yaroslav, Laurent,
There was a bug (#764820) reported last week for aghermann-1.0.1, about menu
entries missing icons. So here's 1.0.2 with a fix (also for some lesser
issues raised by current lintian), which I am humbly asking you to sponsor
upload.
The dsc link is
Hi Yaroslav,
A recent lintian check has found this issue:
http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/johnhom...@gmail.com.html#aghermann, and
I have prepared version -2 to fix that (as suggested on
wiki.debian.org/Hardening).
The changes are trivial and straightforward:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 14:56:31 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
The .dsc file there is incorrect
$ dget
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_1.0.1-2.dsc
Sorry, it's some stale files lying around. Incidentally, I've been long
wanting to try xz
Yaroslav, Matthias,
To deal with the bug #747994 (details below), I have removed the g++ version
selection overrides in debian/rules. These workarounds are now not necessary
because aghermann will build happily with g++-4.8, which is now the default
in testing.
I also poked upstream to make
Hi Yaroslav,
There seems to be an ongoing issue with building aghermann on arches
which have g++ at version 4.6:
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:02:02 +
From: peter green plugw...@p10link.net
To: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Package: aghermann
Version: 1.0-2
Severity:
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
32bit builds have problems
http://neuro.debian.net/_files/_buildlogs/aghermann/0.9.1
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, andrei zavada wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
Here's upstream's two-month work on aghermann, which I am hereby asking
you to upload:
http
Hi Yaroslav,
Here's upstream's two-month work on aghermann, which I am hereby asking you
to upload:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.9.1-1.dsc
Thanks,
Andrei
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Yaroslav,
Here's upstream's two-month work on aghermann, which I am hereby asking you
to upload:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.9.1-1.dsc
Thanks (sorry for possible multiple copies),
Andrei
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Oopsie, the configure.ac happened to have a stray mremap check from 2011 or
so, which I have now thrown away, with a fair amount of cursing.
So here is the whole thing again:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.9.0.4-1.dsc
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Andrei
Hi Yaroslav,
There was a bug #708557 reported yesterday against aghermann, filed on behalf
of all kfreebsd users. As I now stand accused of discrimination against these
minority arches, I hasten to rectify this with 0.9.0.3, in which I accommodate
the poor souls who have no mremap function in
Indeed.
As I see it, this can be done in many ways, and to various degrees of
compliance with Rechtschaffen Kales (1968) guidelines. Much of it is
there still open to investigation, let alone actual implementation. Knowing
how costly and painful it can be to scrap code midway down the road, I'm
Yaroslav,
Here's the thing in which that FTBFS is properly addressed. It's 0.9.0.2 now:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.9.0.2-1.dsc
If all goes well this time, I wouldn't bother you with version bumps for about
two or three more months, as upstream is
make[5]: *** [liba_a-source-base.o] Error 1
On Fri, 03 May 2013, andrei zavada wrote:
Well, AFK means nothing if you own a Motorola Milestone. With
patience,
you can get a chrooted debian on it, with git, emacs, and all the
dpkg-*
bits needed to build a package! So here
... where? ;) haven't been there for ... 12 years ;-)
what about changing distribution to unstable from experimental and I
would upload it next monday ? ;)
On Wed, 01 May 2013, andrei zavada wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
Here's a new version of Aghermann, which upstream has worked hard to
deliver
Hi Yaroslav,
Here's a new version of Aghermann, which upstream has worked hard to deliver
before they, with women and children, leave for the Crimea today, all highly
confident the build will succeed and they can enjoy the sun totally AFK for
two weeks.
The dsc file is here:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:44:33 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko y...@debian.org wrote:
or as far as I am concerned if you verified with vanilla gcc 4.8 -- it
should be good enough and just include that closes statement here
Fixed as you said and reuploaded to the same URL:
Hi Yaroslav Matthias,
I'm pushing out aghermann-0.8.1 ahead of my usual dev cycle to close bug
#701241, which is FTBSF with g++-4.8. Although this bug has been opened
against an ancient version (0.6), it has indeed persisted until 0.8.
I was able to compile 0.8.1 with 4.6, 4.7 and the latest
--
From: Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com
Date: 6 February 2013 17:11
Subject: Re: Possible misconfiguration of mail server on wagner?
To: andrei zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, andrei zavada wrote:
CIA -- is a system to send announcements on commits
Hi Yaroslav,
On behalf of aghermann upstream, I'm asking you to upload the latest version
0.8. Verified build on debian wheezy/sid and ubuntu p (all as before) as
well as on quantal.
The link to dsc is here:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.8-1.dsc
Cheers,
Hi Yaroslav,
Deeply concerned as I am about market share loss aghermann has run into lately
(http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=aghermann),
upstream has worked hard to deliver aghermann-0.7.5.1, for you to kindly
sponsor upload. It's the first aghermann that's SMP-enabled!
Here's
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:41:55 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, andrei zavada wrote:
drwxrwsr-x 4 hmmr-guest hmmr-guest 4096 Jul 22 19:02 public_git/
hmmr-guest@wagner:~]
...which I honestly thought is what's required of me in this matter.
Ok
On 25 Sep 2012 04:24, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
btw -- coming to SfN by any chance?
Not really probably, because I'm Kiev-bound until next job change (or
something as bad). But what is SfN, and where?
nope -- this fix for changelog will be Released with the next upload
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:39:59 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
- it is not listed on http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/
- because there is no hmmr-guest under /srv/git.debian.org/git/users on
git.debian.org
- because there is no public_git under your home
Thanks for uploading!
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:51:21 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
ideally debian/changelog should describe what was done to debian/ for
that release: you have switched to dh version 9, but no mentioning
in the debian/changelog . Please commit such change
Hi Yaroslav,
Long time no new releases of Aghermann; too bad, fixing it now with a new
shining aghermann-0.7.1. Here's the link:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.7.1-1.dsc
It builds on debian sid and wheezy (including nd+ flavours), and ubuntu
precise.
Hope
Hi Yaroslav,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:31:10 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
still not sure what is the reason since dpkg-source should build
.debian.tar.gz just fine whenever you have .orig.tar.gz already. but
ok -- if it is solved -- good enough for me
I'm reading man
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:38:53 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
...
we do! so now I can only start speculating what has happened in your
case:
- was building from a wrong (old?) directory
- have some local .git/* settings precluding inclusion of debian/upstream
Oh well,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:38:53 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, andrei zavada wrote:
An hour of debian maintenance a day keeps doctors away.
LOL! That is the spirit!
You make me blush, guys.
The quote itself is a cliché older than the total age
) unstable; urgency=low
- * Add debian/upstream file.
+ * More meaningful README.Debian.
+ * Clean up build-depends.
+ * Put all copyright info where it belongs.
+ * Move examples into a dedicated doc/examples dir.
- -- Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com Sat, 28 Jul 2012 00:42:00 +0200
Hi Yaroslav,
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:24:24 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko y...@debian.org wrote:
wasn't the plan to keep it under pkg-exppsy? but I see
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/users/hmmr-guest/cnrun.git
-Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/hmmr-guest/cnrun.git
Hi Luca, Yaroslav,
Thanks for the bunch of pertinent remarks. I really learned a thing or two
about Debian process as I went through them one by one. Here's hoping the way
I dealt with them is satisfactory. For details, you can check the current
state in... oops... For some reason, even after
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:38:02 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
now we would just need to push,m point default HEAD to the branch
which contains debian packaging (haven't looked) with smth like
echo 'ref: refs/heads/debian' | HEAD
Branch 'master' already contains all
Hi Yaroslav and Andreas,
Such a lively discussion has been happening here while I wasn't watching :}
I definitely don't mind putting my (both) git repositories in team
maintenance. I just submitted a collb-maint join request to this effect.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:15:34 +0200
Hi Yaroslav,
In this new package:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/cnrun/source/deb/cnrun_1.1.12-2.dsc I
have included the debian/upstream, which contains the details of the paper
where cnrun was first used.
I leave it to you to decide whether this single addition warrants a
rebuild/reupload
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:12:02 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
ok -- 1.1.12-1 was uploaded -- let's see how well it survives the NEW
queue ;-)
Thanks!
and then we should add it to neuroscience-modeling
debian-science blend. BTW -- do you have a reference/citation for it?
Hi Yaroslav,
well, technically speaking there is no strict requirement to host packaging
repository on git.debian.org but it is indeed strongly encouraged!
I have refreshed my keys on alioth and set up the new git remote for cnrun.
Somewhat
stronger advisory (almost requirement) is to point
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
* Package name: cnrun
Version : 1.1.12
Upstream Author : Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
* URL : http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/cnrun
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Hi Yaroslav,
Following up on the just filed ITP for my new package, cnrun: here's
the dsc link:
http://johnhommer.com//academic/code/cnrun/source/deb/cnrun_1.1.12-1.dsc.
Herewith kindly requesting my trusty mentor to do the final QA and
build and upload. I verified the build my end using
Hi Yaroslav,
Somehow your last email slipped into my archive mail folder unnoticed and
remained there for a week, unread (blame my fetchmail setup and the new
job I've started last Monday). So here's the new dsc link:
Hi Yaroslav,
I'm here again and I've got a new version of aghermann for the great good. It
builds for these arches (verified by nd_build):
aghermann_0.7.0-1~nd70+2_i386.build OK 7:17.54 real, 218.66 user,
19.49 sys, 0 out
aghermann_0.7.0-1~nd70+2_amd64.buildOK 7:29.61 real,
Hi again,
I see two warnings reported during build log checks of recently
uploaded 0.6.0.1-1. They were triggered by AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]) in
aghermann's configure.in. I'm fixing this in
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.6.0.1-2.dsc.
Can you re-upload
Ok, I've seen quite a bit of things being built, but the nd_build tops it
all.
I figured that due to g++-4.6 = 4.6.2 requirement, only debian-wheezy,
debian-sid (also their nd+ counterparts), and ubuntu precise, can build
aghermann. This is what I get after nd_build4all:
3006 Jun 4 18:41
-0400
@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
-aghermann (0.5.90-2) unstable; urgency=low
+aghermann (0.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
- * Fix build with --as-needed (closes: #673405);
- * Don't call deprecated g_thread_init.
+ * New upstream version.
- -- Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com Sat, 19 May 2012 01:17
Hi Yaroslav,
So I would mandate you to double-check that your package builds fine in a
clean environment before seeking sponsorship! ;)
http://neuro.debian.net/blog/2012/2012-04-14_ndtools.html might be of
Following your advice, I installed the neurodebian package now. Of course
this would
Hi Yaroslav,
There was a bug, #673405, filed against aghermann-0.5.90-1, which I have
fixed in the 0.5.90-2 available here:
http://johnhommer.com//academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.5.90-2.dsc.
The fix is trivial and straightforward, yet I'm somewhat apprehensive of any
trivial
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 22:32:15 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
Thanks!
uploaded to Debian (and neurodebian, although just wheezy/sid)
Thanks. Aghermann's packaging team is rejoicing at this wholesome picture:
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012, andrei zavada wrote:
I fixed it, checked that it builds on amd64 and i386,
btw -- how are you checking that? did I mention before NeuroDebian way
to make up a little build farm? e.g.
For i386, I have a spare Dell laptop
Hi Yaroslav, Mattias,
To address bug #667096 filed recently against aghermann:
From: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
Sender: Matthias Klose d...@ravel.debian.org
To: mainto...@bugs.debian.org
Package: aghermann
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid wheezy
User:
Yaroslav Halchenko y...@debian.org wrote:
so -- there should be (Closes: #667096) in your last
debian/changelog entry
Fair enough. Uploading the whole thing with debian/changelog corrected,
to the same URL (hope no one noticed :).
pgpMHp2Ss97B3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Yaroslav,
As this email's subject suggests, it's another version bump for aghermann.
There
is a fix for the hurd-i386 build and a moderate amount of other fixes
and new features, too.
Here is the link to the dsc file:
Hi Yaroslav,
A new version of Aghermann is here, with some new features and some
bugfixes as usual, and a good chance it will not break on that
mysterious armel architecture.
Please find the .dsc file here:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.5.2-1.dsc.
Cheers,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:00:39 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
so it is all good besides armel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aghermannarch=armelver=0.5.1.1-1stamp=1327293393
Looking at this:
../core/tunable.hh:261: confused by earlier errors, bailing
Hi Yaroslav,
Ok, autoreconf shadows are defeated now.
The winning move was to include autoconf-archive in Build-Depends (along
with dh-autoreconf, obviously, and append --with autoreconf in rules).
I could then safely remove all Makefile.in files from the original
installation tarball, plus
Hi Yaroslav,
I did it again, a new version. It's mostly bugfixes. The link to the
.dsc file is
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.5.1-1.dsc.
btw -- if you would have loved your sponsor, you would have dropped all
autotools pregenerated crap and re-generated
Hi Yaroslav,
Thanks a lot for the sponsorship!
What about an i386 package? Shall I build some and post it to
where you can fetch it, like we did with amd64.deb?
Cheers,
Andrei
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:53:04 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
ok -- please find attached the
Hi Yaroslav,
On 3 January 2012 02:16, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
* Author: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
* Parts from PhysioToolKit
(http://www.physionet.org/physiotools,
* by George B. Moody (geo...@mit.edu))
After
://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: Aghermann
Upstream-Contact: Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
Source: http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/
Files: *
Copyright: 2008-2012 Andrei Zavada johnhom...@gmail.com
License: GPL-2+
Files: src/libexstrom
Hi,
I am uploading the same version 0.4.4-1 again, but with debian/copyright
and changelog amended:
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.4.4-1.dsc
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi Yaroslav,
I am still to do a quick code-review and testing and then with
those copyright file changes we might be all set to go
The rest of the holidays (green tea works!) was actually quite
productive, and here's version 0.4.4 for your code-reviewing pleasure.
I've even updated copyright
://www.onerussian.com/tmp/aghermann_0.4.3.3-1_amd64.build
Cheers
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011, andrei zavada wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
Sorry for taking a week to respond. There was not a single day last
week I could have a contiguous space of one hour to address the
issues
)? ;-)
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, andrei zavada wrote:
* maintenance inside Debian Med team sounds good to me too, since
�NeuroDebian team is also a part of it and it would allow more helpful
�hands to keep it in good shape ;-)
Now, what do I do next?� Actually, I routinely do dpkg
On Nov 29, 2011 7:35 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
* as for the task, I would also recommend adding it to Electrophysiology
task page
http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/electrophysiology
of Debian Science
Electrophysiology is fine just as well.
if you
81 matches
Mail list logo
