Re: routine-update adds debhelpe (Was: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing])

Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:48:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > There's already a bug report: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003590 > which has been fixed in the latest upload > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1297402/accepted-lintian-brush-0120-source-into-unstable/ >

Re: routine-update adds debhelpe (Was: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing])

On 1/25/22 10:43 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:44:52PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: @Andreas, something is wrong with lintian-brush/routine-update and it is adding "debhelper" as a B-D, for instance here[1] and here[2] and pretty much every other package that you updated.

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Flavien, Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:52:18PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: > I confirm I managed to reproduce the FTBFS before by updating my pbuilder > image. > > Hoping that nothing else is updated up to the time you read this email, this > should be fixed thanks to a new patch. :) Nilesh

routine-update adds debhelpe (Was: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing])

Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:44:52PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > @Andreas, > something is wrong with lintian-brush/routine-update and it is adding > "debhelper" as a B-D, for instance > here[1] and here[2] and pretty much every other package that you updated. > This is completely uncalled for

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

On 1/25/22 8:22 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote: I confirm I managed to reproduce the FTBFS before by updating my pbuilder image. Hoping that nothing else is updated up to the time you read this email, this should be fixed thanks to a new patch. :) Thanks Flavien, it is currently building on my

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

I confirm I managed to reproduce the FTBFS before by updating my pbuilder image. Hoping that nothing else is updated up to the time you read this email, this should be fixed thanks to a new patch. :) Cheers, *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT* Director of Software Development IRCAD France & IRCAD

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Ok I think I understand the problem, vtk was updated in between (last Friday). I still have vtk 9.0 and you guys have 9.1. :( One more patch to go ! ^^ I'll update my pbuilder image and fix this today. Sorry for that. :/ *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT* Director of Software Development IRCAD France &

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

On 1/24/22 10:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:53:13PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: Well this is weird, I also built with pbuilder with sid (chroot updated last friday). Is it maybe testing on your side? Its definitely not testing since I never use a testing chroot

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:53:13PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: > Well this is weird, I also built with pbuilder with sid (chroot updated last > friday). Is it maybe testing on your side? Its definitely not testing since I never use a testing chroot for my pbuilder. May be somebody else can

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Well this is weird, I also built with pbuilder with sid (chroot updated last friday). Is it maybe testing on your side? *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT* Director of Software Development IRCAD France & IRCAD Africa flavien.brida...@ircad.fr Tél. : +33 (0)3 88

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi, I have no idea why salsa-ci fails unpacking sight. Thus I can't verify my issue to build the package on Salsa. In any case I get something like ... /build/sight-21.0.0/libs/core/core/tools/Dispatcher.hpp:180:30: recursively required from 'static void

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Andreas, Well, there was no answer from ITK Uploaders here, but I filled a bug as you recommended. I also added a patch to temporarily disable the guilty filter and fix the link stage, this builds fine on my side. Please confirm this is ok for you. Thanks as always for your time. :)

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Flavien, Am Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:16:19AM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: > Well, sorry I assumed this module was not built for a reason... It is > actually an experimental module for algorithms, that may be promoted in a > real category if they are judged good enough. > > See

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Andreas, Well, sorry I assumed this module was not built for a reason... It is actually an experimental module for algorithms, that may be promoted in a real category if they are judged good enough. See https://itk.org/Doxygen/html/group__ITKReview.html. So I have no idea if Debian wants

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Flavien, Am Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:33:28PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: > I have understood the problem. The missing image filter has moved in an > optional module, ITKReview. > > Two possible solutions: > > 1. modify the ITK package in order to enable the build of the ITKReview > module

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Andreas, I have understood the problem. The missing image filter has moved in an optional module, ITKReview. Two possible solutions: 1. modify the ITK package in order to enable the build of the ITKReview module 2. remove the filter from sight build - this is what we did on Windows

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Andreas, I am a bit disappointed it doesn't build because we do use ITK5 on Windows. Anyway, I'll take care of this of course, thanks for trying. :) Cheers, *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT* Director of Software Development IRCAD France & IRCAD Africa flavien.brida...@ircad.fr

Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Flavien, as you can see below ITK4 is buggy and we switched to ITK5 anyway so ITK4 will be removed. To verify whether sight might build with ITK5 smoothly I simply replaced libinsighttoolkit4-dev by libinsighttoolkit5-dev in (Build-)Depends[1], but obviously: ... [ 81%] Building CXX object