Re: Debian Med Sprint from February 18. to 21.

Hi Andreas, Le 17/01/2021 à 17:52, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi Pierre, On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:23:08PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: But I never took part to such event, so could you please give some examples about possible outputs? There is no dedicated output of our sprints. The major

Re: Re: Acquiring Dental RVG on Linux

Am Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 06:36:49PM +0100 schrieb Hilbert, Sebastian: > When you talk about the comparison, are you comparing an image displayed > inside > their software/viewer to an image that gets reconstructed from the DIY driver > ? That is what I did, yes. Or, rather, a jpeg *produced* by

Re: Re: Acquiring Dental RVG on Linux

test -- GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B

Re: bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-6

Étienne Mollier wrote: > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to > testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. The problem being that the bedtools-test package's symlink to the htsutil executable located in the bedtools package is not adequately copied when the test files are copied to

Re: Re: Acquiring Dental RVG on Linux

Am Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 08:44:54AM +0530 schrieb Sonali Warunjikar: > http://mayuresh.sdfeu.org/snaps.zip > > vendor.jpg: using vendor software which seems to adjust `something' > > ours.png: ours, appears underexposed > > raw.dat: raw sensor data 12 bit little endian 0 padded (a program to deal

Re: ready for upload: librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10

On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:26:36PM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote: > Andreas Tille kirjoitti 15.1.2021 klo 12.27: > > Thanks again for your very welcome help. The package is currently building > > on > > my machine and will be uploaded soon. > > I prepared another upload to fix debci failures[1]

Re: Debian Med Sprint from February 18. to 21.

Hi Pierre, On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:23:08PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > > to push the huge effort of our permanent COVID-19 effort forward to make > > it visible inside the next Debian release. > > I feel enthusiastic about this, even in a fully online version. The advantage is that the

Should we offer Debian Med workflow-containers?

Hello, Our HPC environment does not offer Docker, but Singularity (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177459) is supported. I thought I should give it a shot. Is anybody using this already on this list? Best, Steffen

Re: Re: Acquiring Dental RVG on Linux

Am Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 08:17:38AM +0530 schrieb Sonali Warunjikar: > > It alludes to LUT > That is IDENTITY. It would almost certainly mean no transformation. > > > and Rescale > Intercept 0 and scale 1 again means there is no transformation. > > > and Pixel Intensity Relationship > Its linear.

Re: bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-6

Hi Charles, Hi Juhani, Thanks for your thoughts, I pushed the changes. Charles Plessy, on 2021-01-17 21:45:52 +0900: > Le Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Étienne Mollier a écrit : > > > > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to > > testing, so I pushed a fix[1].

Re: Debian Med Sprint from February 18. to 21.

Hi Andreas and everyone, Le 16/01/2021 à 12:45, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi folks, since 2011 we are doing Debian Med developer sprints and it had turned out that these events are very successfully. Due to the well known situation in person meetings are not possible currently - but this should

Re: bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-6

Étienne Mollier kirjoitti 17.1.2021 klo 14.20: > Hi, > > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to > testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. Since this is transition freeze, > I'm not 100% sure if it should be pushed, current Testing > version is 2.29.2+dfsg-3, and there are a few

Re: bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-6

Le Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Étienne Mollier a écrit : > > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to > testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. Since this is transition freeze, > I'm not 100% sure if it should be pushed, current Testing > version is 2.29.2+dfsg-3, and there

Re: ready for upload: librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10

Hi, about this package again, Andreas Tille kirjoitti 15.1.2021 klo 12.27: > Thanks again for your very welcome help. The package is currently building on > my machine and will be uploaded soon. I prepared another upload to fix debci failures[1] and added a new patch to enable the upgrade to

bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-6

Hi, I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. Since this is transition freeze, I'm not 100% sure if it should be pushed, current Testing version is 2.29.2+dfsg-3, and there are a few reverse dependencies. [1]