Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm
Hi Steffen, Am Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 02:23:22PM +0100 schrieb Steffen Möller: > Hi Andreas, > it will be best to remove it, I suggest. I just had the idea whe can do something inbetween: Add some README.Debian that Python3 interface is "probably broken since the test we added fails." Users who might *really* use this interface might possibly provide a solution we have no capacity to seek for. I simply move the Python part of the autopkgtest to this README.Debian. > I do not have any personal contact to upstream, somehwat unfortunate since > this looks very nice and educational, but ... unless someone enjoys such a > transition, I suggest to just wait for a version 0.10. Well, waiting for some version 0.10 sounds not very realistic, The package is on SourceForge which somehow smells very agy. Given that 0.9-rc3 is from 2013-08-09 we can safely assume that the world will not see any version 0.10, IMHO. Kind regards Andreas. > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Februar 2024 um 14:02 Uhr > > Von: "Andreas Tille" > > An: "Debian Med Project List" > > Cc: "Steffen Möller" > > Betreff: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm > > > > Hi again, > > > > if there is no response of kind "Yes, please try to keep the Python > > interface of ghmm" it will be removed soon. > > > > Kind regards > >Andreas. > > > > Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:34AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > > Hi Steffen (and two whom it might concern), > > > > > > when Israel has written the autopkgtest for ghmm it turned > > > out that there are several issues with the Python3 interface. > > > In Matrix Nilesh raised the perfectly valid question: > > > > > >The py interface is living off a patch from py2to3 and is (very) > > >broken. It needs quite a lot of patching. Maybe it's a sensible thing > > > to > > >evaluate if we even need it? > > > > > > Could you please state your opinion about this? > > > > > > We should respond in a timely manner to the atlas removal > > > effort (patch in Git) and currently it is blocked by the > > > test suite issue of the Python3 interface. > > > > > > Kind regards > > >Andreas. > > > > > > -- > > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > -- http://fam-tille.de
Aw: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm
Hi Andreas, it will be best to remove it, I suggest. I do not have any personal contact to upstream, somehwat unfortunate since this looks very nice and educational, but ... unless someone enjoys such a transition, I suggest to just wait for a version 0.10. Best, Steffen > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Februar 2024 um 14:02 Uhr > Von: "Andreas Tille" > An: "Debian Med Project List" > Cc: "Steffen Möller" > Betreff: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm > > Hi again, > > if there is no response of kind "Yes, please try to keep the Python > interface of ghmm" it will be removed soon. > > Kind regards >Andreas. > > Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:34AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Hi Steffen (and two whom it might concern), > > > > when Israel has written the autopkgtest for ghmm it turned > > out that there are several issues with the Python3 interface. > > In Matrix Nilesh raised the perfectly valid question: > > > >The py interface is living off a patch from py2to3 and is (very) > >broken. It needs quite a lot of patching. Maybe it's a sensible thing to > >evaluate if we even need it? > > > > Could you please state your opinion about this? > > > > We should respond in a timely manner to the atlas removal > > effort (patch in Git) and currently it is blocked by the > > test suite issue of the Python3 interface. > > > > Kind regards > >Andreas. > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm
Hi again, if there is no response of kind "Yes, please try to keep the Python interface of ghmm" it will be removed soon. Kind regards Andreas. Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:34AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Steffen (and two whom it might concern), > > when Israel has written the autopkgtest for ghmm it turned > out that there are several issues with the Python3 interface. > In Matrix Nilesh raised the perfectly valid question: > >The py interface is living off a patch from py2to3 and is (very) >broken. It needs quite a lot of patching. Maybe it's a sensible thing to >evaluate if we even need it? > > Could you please state your opinion about this? > > We should respond in a timely manner to the atlas removal > effort (patch in Git) and currently it is blocked by the > test suite issue of the Python3 interface. > > Kind regards >Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > -- http://fam-tille.de
