Re: qiime2 status update

2020-12-01 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-12-01 19:42:23 +0100: > Does this mean that the many q2-xyz packages we can now also think about > updating? Sounds like it! :) Cheers, -- Étienne Mollier Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse

Re: qiime2 status update

2020-12-01 Thread Steffen Möller
Well done, Étienne! Does this mean that the many q2-xyz packages we can now also think about updating? Best, Steffen On 01.12.20 19:14, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Tille, on 2020-12-01 09:46:28 +0100: >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: >>>

Re: qiime2 status update

2020-12-01 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-12-01 09:46:28 +0100: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Changes are not marked ready for > > upload yet, as there might still be some blocking points > > reported by the package tracker[1], notably 32-bits support. > > I'd

Re: qiime2 status update

2020-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi there, > > Sorry it took quite a long time, I kind of struggled a bit with > the test suite of qiime. In the end I had to disable the build > time test, since apparently, pkg_resources is rather picky about > the

qiime2 status update

2020-11-30 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi there, Sorry it took quite a long time, I kind of struggled a bit with the test suite of qiime. In the end I had to disable the build time test, since apparently, pkg_resources is rather picky about the location of its modules, and the hack in place was not working with python 3.8 and 3.9.