Re: build bug or change?

1998-04-09 Thread Michael Borella
This worked. Great. But isn't this an ugly fix? Perhaps there is a problem with debstd. -Mike On Tue, Apr 07, 1998 at 04:49:48PM -0500, Michael Borella wrote: When I do an sudo build on a debianized directory, I get the following debstd README --- debstd processing

One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Bob Hilliard
I am preparing my first package, and am building it by hand to get a clearer understanding of the package building process. It will have two binary packages, dictd and dict, both of which come from the dictd source. I have reached the point where the first, and larger, package produces

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Your debian/rules should build *both* packages. Here's the debian/rules from my GIMP packages. It should clear up your confusion. It uses debhelper judiciously; I'd recommend using debhelper to save your sanity. :) #!/usr/bin/make -f # First, we build the package. The automake/aclocal/autoconf

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Adam P. Harris
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your debian/rules should build *both* packages. Here's the debian/rules from my GIMP packages. It should clear up your confusion. It uses debhelper judiciously; I'd recommend using debhelper to save your sanity. :) Bob, don't fear the reaper. dh_*

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I have this in my directory on master (rules.tar.gz, I think). README follows (the tarball has HTML stuff in it too, meant to be dropped onto the develoers corner web page). manoj __ Here are a set

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Adam P. Harris
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have this in my directory on master (rules.tar.gz, I think). README follows (the tarball has HTML stuff in it too, meant to be dropped onto the develoers corner web page). You should just put this up on the public HTML space on master...?

Re: orig source

1998-04-09 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Jeff Shilt wrote: I'm working on packaging FPK-pascal compiler, and I was was wondering what exactly is meant by the original source. The sources for fpc come with source for linux, dos, amiga, etc. Plus, the makefiles in the

Re: orig source

1998-04-09 Thread Carey Evans
Jeff Shilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is the original, exactly the way I got it, or can I remove the other OS specific directories, fix all the makefiles and have this be the original source. I've gotten the impression that the best way to do it is to use *pristine* uptream source, which

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 8 Apr 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Here's the debian/rules from my GIMP packages. It should clear up your confusion. It uses debhelper judiciously; I'd recommend using debhelper to save your sanity. :) #!/usr/bin/make -f # First, we build the

Building sublanguages from gcc

1998-04-09 Thread pouellet
Hello, I have the hang of building a package with deb-make and build scripts, but I've run into a snag. I'm attempting to package the latest version of gpc (gpc-980405) but it wants to be built from the gcc directory. You can't start build in the gpc subdirectory (where ever/gcc-2.8.0/p).

Re: orig source

1998-04-09 Thread Rainer Clasen
Hi! Carey Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I've gotten the impression that the best way to do it is to use *pristine* uptream source, which means that the .orig.tar.gz is really the tar file you downloaded. The changes should all be in the (automatically generated) .diff.gz. Does this also apply

Re: ssh-agent (continuing saga)

1998-04-09 Thread Joel Klecker
At 11:57 -0500 1998-04-09, Zed Pobre wrote: Okay, I seem to have ssh-agent set up well enough that it runs. However, it now complains: Agent parent directory is not sticky, mode is 40777 it should be 041777 To which directory is it referring? /tmp -- Joel Espy Kleckermailto:[EMAIL

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Santiago == Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Santiago I disagree here. Santiago If you put this in a different debian/rules target Santiago (called, for example, automake-refresh), then you and Santiago only you would be forced to have automake and autoconf Santiago

Re: One source, two binary packages

1998-04-09 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 9 Apr 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote: For the GIMP packages, it is required; they ship with a libtool that is incompatible with Debian policy. I have to run automake/aclocal/autoconf every single time the package builds to remove all vestiges of the old

Example files now have http access

1998-04-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Thanks to a suggestion by aph, the example debian files I have been giving out are now available at http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/ and the full tar file at http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/rules.tar.gz enjoy. manoj -- It was pity stayed his hand. Pity I