On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the upload queues are reserved for developers. The indirect queues
will allow
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:06:18PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:30:11PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 11:39:12AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
uh? how is dpkg-shlibdeps related to libtool?!?
Ah...
Domenico,
Does the shlibs.local file you posted work the way you want it to? If so,
oh my shlibs.local works the way i want. it's ok.
adding the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to dpkg-shlibdeps will fix the warning message...
I don't know what else needs fixing?
what i want to understand end to fix
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
Hi,
I intend to pick up the orphaned chbg package
and tried to pack the new upstream release.
The files are at
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/chbg/
Would anybody sponsor the package?
Stupid question, its
Hi!
On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
now that the packaging manual has been merged.
Oh, merged? So all important information included in
the Packaging manual should be present in the Policy now?
Or is this work in
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 05:39:56PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:38:09PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
What is the correct section for the freeswan (IPSec) package ? My sponsor
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh uploaded the package to non-US, but it does not get
installed into unstable (since about a week). Currently the section is
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:20:11AM -0500, Christopher Allen wrote:
As part of my new-maintainer process tasks, I'm packaging z81, a
Sinclair ZX81/ZX80 emulator. The emulator provides three binaries: a
X version (xz81), an SVGA version (z81) and a linux-console version
(z81txt).
[snip policy]
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Jochen, I get this from lintian:
N: unknown interpreter
[repeat N times]
W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
You haven't got the latest version of lintian. Upgrade it and try again;
lintian was giving false
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the upload queues are reserved for developers. The indirect queues
Florian Hinzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
now that the packaging manual has been merged.
Oh, merged? So all important information included in
the Packaging manual should be present in
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:21:38PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:20:11AM -0500, Christopher Allen wrote:
This means that when a package produces one binary which can optionally
have X support (like gnuplot), it should have it. In your case (and mine,
lxdoom), separate
In Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:29:21 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
what i'd like to do is to check what has been uploaded by my sponsor
and to
look at the reports in case of rejection.
for main i look at http://incoming.debian.org, for non-US?
There's no
Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they have
been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
package...
It is in fact most welcome.
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
In Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:29:21 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
There's no public access to non-US Incoming AFAIR. Anyway, you should
get a
REJECT email from dinstall if the package gets rejected and you're
listed as
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Jochen, I get this from lintian:
N: unknown interpreter
[repeat N times]
W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
You haven't got the latest version of
Hi,
I'm a relatively new Debian maintainer, and I've now had several bugs filed
against some of my packages for which I never received email notification.
I've also had bugs filed for which I have received notification. I
was just wondering if anyone else out there was having problems with bug
On 20010125T195935+0200, Moshe Zadka wrote:
Where are each virtual package capabilities listed?
I mean, something like: to provide a mail-transport-agent,
there must be a /usr/lib/sendmail, which accepts the following options.
Does nobody read policy anymore?
Policy Manual, section 12.6.
Adam == Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uhh, why are there no redistribution terms on your package?
(and since you do not in any way, shape, or form include Dan's
code, your code is all that is in the package)
Adam There aren't any. The problem is that the source package
Adam
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the upload queues are reserved for developers. The indirect queues
will allow
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:15:14AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Oh, for heavens sake. Start a fresh directory, called
foo-installer. Create a ./debian directory. create a script that
called create-foo-pkg-now (or something you like better); Also create
./debis-dir-for-foo/debian.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:06:18PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the upload
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:30:11PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 11:39:12AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
uh? how is dpkg-shlibdeps related to libtool?!?
Ah...
Domenico,
Does the shlibs.local file you posted work the way you want it to? If so,
oh my shlibs.local works the way i want. it's ok.
adding the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to dpkg-shlibdeps will fix the warning message...
I don't know what else needs fixing?
what i want to understand end to fix
As part of my new-maintainer process tasks, I'm packaging z81, a
Sinclair ZX81/ZX80 emulator. The emulator provides three binaries: a
X version (xz81), an SVGA version (z81) and a linux-console version
(z81txt).
I have a few questions about how to properly package these.
First, about the X
Hi,
I intend to pick up the orphaned chbg package
and tried to pack the new upstream release.
The files are at
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/chbg/
Would anybody sponsor the package?
Jochen
--
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/
pgp0UNOS00OTR.pgp
Description:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 02:50:46PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
I like to build my mysql package with chroot support and therfore jail it
somewhere under /var/lib/mysql and link the log files to /var/log.
Do you plan to make them officially available in debian?
I either statically link it
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
Hi,
I intend to pick up the orphaned chbg package
and tried to pack the new upstream release.
The files are at
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/chbg/
Would anybody sponsor the package?
Stupid question, its
In Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:26:32 -0600 Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cum veritate scripsit :
Hello,
Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they
have
been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
package...
I have no clue whether that
Hi!
On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
now that the packaging manual has been merged.
Oh, merged? So all important information included in
the Packaging manual should be present in the Policy now?
Or is this work in
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 05:39:56PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:38:09PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
What is the correct section for the freeswan (IPSec) package ? My sponsor
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh uploaded the package to non-US, but it does not
get
installed into unstable (since about a week). Currently the section is
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:20:11AM -0500, Christopher Allen wrote:
As part of my new-maintainer process tasks, I'm packaging z81, a
Sinclair ZX81/ZX80 emulator. The emulator provides three binaries: a
X version (xz81), an SVGA version (z81) and a linux-console version
(z81txt).
[snip policy]
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Jochen, I get this from lintian:
N: unknown interpreter
[repeat N times]
W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
You haven't got the latest version of lintian. Upgrade it and try again;
lintian was giving false
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i'm looking for the incoming queue for non-US. as i see in the debian
developer reference, it seems it is reserved only for debian developer.
All of the upload queues are reserved for developers. The indirect queues
Florian Hinzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24-Jan-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
Section 4.1 of policy 3.2.0.0/3.2.1.0, or section 11.1 of policy 3.2.1.2
now that the packaging manual has been merged.
Oh, merged? So all important information included in
the Packaging manual should be present in the
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:21:38PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:20:11AM -0500, Christopher Allen wrote:
This means that when a package produces one binary which can optionally
have X support (like gnuplot), it should have it. In your case (and mine,
lxdoom), separate
In Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:29:21 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
what i'd like to do is to check what has been uploaded by my sponsor
and to
look at the reports in case of rejection.
for main i look at http://incoming.debian.org, for non-US?
There's no public
Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they have
been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
package...
It is in fact most welcome.
-Ralf.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
In Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:29:21 +0100 Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum
veritate scripsit :
There's no public access to non-US Incoming AFAIR. Anyway, you should
get a
REJECT email from dinstall if the package gets rejected and you're
listed as
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Jochen, I get this from lintian:
N: unknown interpreter
[repeat N times]
W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
You haven't got the latest version of
Hi,
I'm a relatively new Debian maintainer, and I've now had several bugs filed
against some of my packages for which I never received email notification.
I've also had bugs filed for which I have received notification. I
was just wondering if anyone else out there was having problems with bug
43 matches
Mail list logo
