On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:49:57PM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 12:15:12AM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
-- Would that be 'legal' anyway? Modifiying installed files of one pkg
by the scripts of another? (They're closely related however and chances
are good that after
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 08:07:25PM +, Luis Arocha wrote:
I changed the name and directory of original file from xmorph-2000apr28 to
xmorph-2428.
Don't; there's no need.
You cannot upload a replacement .orig.tar.gz any more. I consider
that to be a fix for a long-time bug.
Hamish
--
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:49:57PM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 12:15:12AM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
-- Would that be 'legal' anyway? Modifiying installed files of one pkg
by the scripts of another? (They're closely related however and chances
are good that after all
Hi,
I intend to package a small collection of Arabic fonts, currently
availble as pcf, and would like to know if, for the Debs source
package, they have to be in bdf and then compiled into pcf for the Debs
font package itself.
I have xtobdf, and was wondering if there are any other such
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 08:07:25PM +, Luis Arocha wrote:
I changed the name and directory of original file from xmorph-2000apr28 to
xmorph-2428.
Don't; there's no need.
You cannot upload a replacement .orig.tar.gz any more. I consider
that to be a fix for a long-time bug.
Hamish
--
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:53:52PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Does your package need package B, or does your package just need package A,
which needs package B?
I would argue (others may disagree :) that if I'm packaging a program that
uses libfoo directly, and the program also uses libbar
6 matches
Mail list logo
