Hi,
I am packaging mosix, which is a cluster computing tool which does fault
tolerance, load balancing and process migration.
It comes as 2 kernel patches. One is a standard kernel patch which I handle
with dh_installkpatches. The other is a tar file, which has to be untarred
in /usr/src/linux.
Viral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, with dh_installinit, the init.d script gets a default priority of
20. How do I change it ?
I tried dh_installinit -- defaults s90 k10
It makes the debs fine, but during installation, update-rc.d grumbles of
bad parameters. Am I using the wrong syntax ? I'm
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello,
I have a multi-binary package which produce arch-dependant .deb (binaries)
and arch-independant (documentation).
[...]
Check out /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi*
Julian
--
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
mail to the upstream maintainter
cc to bug#[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc to the bug reporter
I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
the bug
Hello all,
I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
conditionally install some files.
I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
if it is, make install will install
Hello there,
I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
drivers plus some networking option.
My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
binary (along with the right
Hi,
How does one create a kernel patch.
I tried diff -r --new-files -u old tree new tree
But the resulting patch didn't apply correctly.
I also noticed that my paths were hardcoded in the patch, but I believe
I can solve that by using relative paths.
Either ways, whats the correct way to
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:06:01PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
I have one more question... I set up new commands for distclean: and
clean: rules in my Makefile.am like this:
distclean:
rm -f `find . -name \*~`
rm -f po/*.gmo
clean:
rm -f `find . -name \*~`
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
the bug is #96254, package xstr.
oops, i made a mistake on the bug number, really sorry.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
Take for example
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the policy requires this ? (I read it but it was unclear (to me:))
Yes, in section 5.2 (`debian/rules' - the main building script):
`binary-arch' builds the binary packages which
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
Any hint ?
for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data, and just made
the packages use renamed config files.
it makes things easy
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
Ok I'll find 2 tests machine.
You also may use User mode Linux to play with virtual Debian machine
Rémi Perrot
PGP signature
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
cu
Adrian
I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:42:58AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:22:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just adopted xabacus.
It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
maybe using an
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:11:48PM -0700, Brett Cundal wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
This is the message I got from A. Bunk who handed me the package :
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It seems the best solution indeed. Is there a way to know if a package has been
purged ? dpkg --test-purge ?
You'll have to play with dpkg -s | grep Status: I guess
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
If I have uploaded experimental pacakages to my homepage, how do I make the
required Packages and Sources files so that the packages can be used with
apt-get ?
viral
--
I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
This is the message I got from A. Bunk who handed me the package :
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions
Hi,
I am packaging mosix, which is a cluster computing tool which does fault
tolerance, load balancing and process migration.
It comes as 2 kernel patches. One is a standard kernel patch which I handle
with dh_installkpatches. The other is a tar file, which has to be untarred
in /usr/src/linux.
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
OK, thanks.
I've been looking thru
Viral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, with dh_installinit, the init.d script gets a default priority of
20. How do I change it ?
I tried dh_installinit -- defaults s90 k10
It makes the debs fine, but during installation, update-rc.d grumbles of
bad parameters. Am I using the wrong syntax ? I'm
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:18:18PM +0530, Viral wrote:
Hi,
I am packaging mosix, which is a cluster computing tool which does fault
tolerance, load balancing and process migration.
It comes as 2 kernel patches. One is a standard kernel patch which I handle
with dh_installkpatches. The
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello,
I have a multi-binary package which produce arch-dependant .deb (binaries)
and arch-independant (documentation).
[...]
Check out /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi*
Julian
--
I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
mail to the upstream maintainter
cc to bug#[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc to the bug reporter
I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
the bug has been signed as forwarded.
But on my personal bugs page
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
mail to the upstream maintainter
cc to bug#[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc to the bug reporter
I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
the bug has
I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
Take for example /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi,
The targets are like so:
binary-indep: build install
binary-arch: build install
Both `binary-indep` and
Hello all,
I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
conditionally install some files.
I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
if it is, make install will install
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
conditionally install some files.
I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
if it is, make
I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
drivers plus some networking option.
My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
binary (along with the right .config
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
Take for example /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi,
The targets are like so:
binary-indep:
Em Wed, 23 May 2001 10:52:20 -0400
Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Why don't you just build-depend on the GNOME stuff so that every
architecture will have a similar package?
I won't just compile the gnome stuff in it cause I don't think my little
program should depend on the
Hi,
How does one create a kernel patch.
I tried diff -r --new-files -u old tree new tree
But the resulting patch didn't apply correctly.
I also noticed that my paths were hardcoded in the patch, but I believe
I can solve that by using relative paths.
Either ways, whats the correct way to
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:06:01PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
I have one more question... I set up new commands for distclean: and
clean: rules in my Makefile.am like this:
distclean:
rm -f `find . -name \*~`
rm -f po/*.gmo
clean:
rm -f `find . -name \*~`
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
conditionally install some files.
Well, here's what one of my projects do:
configure.in:
...
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
the bug is #96254, package xstr.
and this is the mail that i received after forwarding the bug:
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 05:18:34 -0500
From: [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
drivers plus some networking option.
My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
binary (along with
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
the bug is #96254, package xstr.
oops, i made a mistake on the bug number, really sorry.
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
Take for example
Colin Watson wrote:
Unfortunately some packages still use it; there are 68 packages in the
archive that build-depend on it. It's not clear that use of debmake can
be considered a bug unless it's actually broken.
And really quite a few more seem to use it according to the graph
somewhere on my
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the policy requires this ? (I read it but it was unclear (to me:))
Yes, in section 5.2 (`debian/rules' - the main building script):
`binary-arch' builds the binary packages which
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
Any hint ?
for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data, and just made
the packages use renamed config files.
it makes things easy
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
`binary-arch' builds the binary packages which are specific to a
particular architecture, and `binary-indep' builds those which are
not.
Thanks for pointing me to
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
Ok I'll find 2 tests machine.
You also may use User mode Linux to play with virtual Debian machine
Rémi Perrot
pgpdbhJrfP6zm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
cu
Adrian
I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:11:48PM -0700, Brett Cundal wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
This is the message I got from A. Bunk who handed me the package :
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:30:13PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
Any hint ?
for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data, and
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:49:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
It seems the best solution indeed. Is there a way to know if a package has
been purged ? dpkg --test-purge ?
You'll have to play with dpkg -s | grep Status: I guess
--
see shy jo
49 matches
Mail list logo
