On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:16:59PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 19-Jun-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 06:24:52PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
And how am I to tell a package that is empty on purpose from one created by
accident? What constitutes empty?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 08:17:03AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Somewhere around line 1100 of /usr/bin/lintian (not sure exactly
where), you could essentially have the following code:
{
local $/;
open FILELIST, $base/index;
my $filelist = FILELIST;
if
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
What if you MOVED the file, rather than copying it: would dpkg still
complain?
Do it in preinst (and don't forget to add the proper error recovery to move
it back should the install fail), and
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that
isn't available on a architecture?
If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable
breaks other packages on the missing architecture(s)). If it's out of
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that
isn't available on a architecture?
If it doesn't exist on purpose (like the mbr package, which only makes
sense on i386), no problem. If it doesn't compile, it won't get into
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable
ok
If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing.
what does out of date mean in this contest?
Cheers
--
Stefano Zack Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing.
what does out of date mean in this contest?
It means that the most recent source version (in unstable) has not been
built for all
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:16:59PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 19-Jun-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 06:24:52PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
And how am I to tell a package that is empty on purpose from one created by
accident? What constitutes empty?
Somewhere around line 1100 of /usr/bin/lintian (not sure exactly
where), you could essentially have the following code:
{
local $/;
open FILELIST, $base/index;
my $filelist = FILELIST;
if ($filelist eq ./\n) {
print W: no files in binary package $pkg\n;
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 08:17:03AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Somewhere around line 1100 of /usr/bin/lintian (not sure exactly
where), you could essentially have the following code:
{
local $/;
open FILELIST, $base/index;
my $filelist = FILELIST;
if
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
What if you MOVED the file, rather than copying it: would dpkg still
complain?
Do it in preinst (and don't forget to add the proper error recovery to move
it back should the install fail), and dpkg
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that
isn't available on a architecture?
Tnx, cheers.
--
Stefano Zack Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 33538863
Home Page: http://www.students.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
Undergraduate student of Computer Science @ University of
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that
isn't available on a architecture?
If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable
breaks other packages on the missing architecture(s)). If it's out of
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
May exists in freezed distribution (and later in stable) a package that
isn't available on a architecture?
If it doesn't exist on purpose (like the mbr package, which only makes
sense on i386), no problem. If it doesn't compile, it won't get into
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
If it's completely unavailable, that's fine (unless it being unavailable
ok
If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing.
what does out of date mean in this contest?
Cheers
--
Stefano Zack Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
If it's out of date, that will keep it out of testing.
what does out of date mean in this contest?
It means that the most recent source version (in unstable) has not been
built for all
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:39:58PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
Hi Julian!
The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture
but
different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
17 matches
Mail list logo
