On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:55:40AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hello,
when i run dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot to create a package, i get the following
error:
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file
Hello,
this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
think it is relevant to this list.
I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
I build it w/ the help of the New Maintainer's
Hello,
I also had the problem of
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`bloksi':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
It seemed
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
Hello,
hi
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},${perl:Depends}
did you try to use debhelper and dh_perl?
cheers
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`bloksi':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
It
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
think it is relevant to this list.
I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
I build it w/ the
Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
What additional security does
I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
From the logos page:
Permission has been given to use the official logo on
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:53:56AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
I have seen business cards from other developers who did use the logo. I
think cards fall into the same category as clothing; if you're a Debian
developer and it's not for profit, I think it's safe to use it. However, if
you're
Samuel == Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Samuel It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign an
Samuel id. That means that checking for one e-mail address for being
Samuel valid and signing all the ids is just bogus. You may use this
Samuel protocol, but you have to
Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robbe What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
Robbe checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
verified actually controls the email address and
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that
Have a look at www.d.o/devel/misc/, and use the tex-file if you want.
It's called 'business card' in english.
/Micce
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46 (0)70 5891533
From: Paolo Molaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
# package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
#
# apt-get source lib*-perl should do it.
Silly question : where do I get source packages? I did what I
Just to say thanks to all who helped. I am now leaving for a week
(going to France, but not Bordeaux), and will continue on packaging
when I get back.
Thanks again,
Etienne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:55:40AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hello,
when i run dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot to create a package, i get the
following error:
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file
Hello,
this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
think it is relevant to this list.
I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
I build it w/ the help of the New Maintainer's
Hello,
I also had the problem of
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`bloksi':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
It seemed
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:47AM +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
[snip]
- debconf doesn't append '|| true' to the init.d stop in prerm. this
means that when start-stop-daemon returns 1 the removal/upgrade fails
miserably if the daemon
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
Hello,
hi
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},${perl:Depends}
did you try to use debhelper and dh_perl?
cheers
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
think it is relevant to this list.
I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
I build it w/ the
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6
package `bloksi':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
It
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Danie,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
going to be easy though.
A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to be your
Eric Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) xmlrpc-c applications must run on distros which provide a copy of
libexpat, and ones which don't. Since the libexpat sonames have not
been incremented in a correct manner on all distributions, it's
extremely hard for me rely on
Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
What additional security does
I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
From the logos page:
Permission has been given to use the official logo on
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
'Business card' in
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:53:56AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
I have seen business cards from other developers who did use the logo. I
think cards fall into the same category as clothing; if you're a Debian
developer and it's not for profit, I think it's safe to use it. However, if
you're
Samuel == Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Samuel It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign an
Samuel id. That means that checking for one e-mail address for being
Samuel valid and signing all the ids is just bogus. You may use this
Samuel protocol, but you have to
Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robbe What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
Robbe checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
verified actually controls the email address and the
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robbe What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
Robbe checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
---BeginMessage---
Have a look at www.d.o/devel/misc/, and use the tex-file if you want.
It's called 'business card' in english.
/Micce
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46
From: Paolo Molaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
# package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
#
# apt-get source lib*-perl should do it.
Silly question : where do I get source packages? I did what I think
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:35:11PM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
From: Paolo Molaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
# package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
#
# apt-get source lib*-perl should do
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Would you think it a good strategy for an xmlrpc-c application to link
statically with its own version of your library, because there are
set-ups out there which have a too old, too new, too screwed
installation of xmlrpc-c?
36 matches
Mail list logo
