Hi,
I packaged iprelay from http://www.stewart.com.au/ip_relay/ and now I
need a sponsor. Here is a short description of the program, from the
webpage:
ip_relay can shape the TCP traffic forwarded through it to a specified
bandwidth and allow this specified bandwidth to be changed on-the-fly.
Hi,
What are the conditions for a package to be included in stable?
I have looked through the policy document to find any clues on this but
I couldn't find anything.
Currently, I maintain the kvirc (and kvirc-doc, kvirc-dev) packages
which have been in unstable since June 20 this year. There
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This code is EXTREMELY EXPERIMENTAL, and may well result in a |
Should this warning determine that this software should stay in
'unstable' and not get into 'testing' untill they make a stable
release?
IMHO no. People will file bugs if it is
Hi,
I packaged iprelay from http://www.stewart.com.au/ip_relay/ and now I
need a sponsor. Here is a short description of the program, from the
webpage:
ip_relay can shape the TCP traffic forwarded through it to a specified
bandwidth and allow this specified bandwidth to be changed on-the-fly.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 05:12:56PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
I packaged iprelay from http://www.stewart.com.au/ip_relay/ and now I
need a sponsor. Here is a short description of the program, from the
webpage:
ip_relay can shape the TCP traffic forwarded through it to a specified
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 06:59:08PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
well, it doesn't need netfilter or anything. you basically say
something like
iprelay -b 2048 10873:ftp.us.debian.org:873
and now 0.0.0.0:10873 is a port through which you can access
ftp.us.debian.org:873 with at most 2 kbps
also sprach Colin Watson (on Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:36:24AM -0500):
Can you describe how this package differs from shaperd?
Package: shaperd
Description: A user-mode traffic shaper for tcp-ip networks.
Shaperd is a user-mode program that can shape traffic passing through
a Linux box. As it
Hi!
How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
also is what I distribute elsewhere.
--
\\//
peter -
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
also is what I distribute elsewhere.
You probably don't want to do this... since a native package has no
.diff.gz, the source tarball must contain everything used to generate the
set of binary packages you're uploading.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:49:51PM +0200, peter karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
Hi!
How do I get
peter karlsson wrote:
How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
also is what I distribute elsewhere.
I would first create
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:49:51PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
Hi!
How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
also is
Hi,
What are the conditions for a package to be included in stable?
I have looked through the policy document to find any clues on this but
I couldn't find anything.
Currently, I maintain the kvirc (and kvirc-doc, kvirc-dev) packages
which have been in unstable since June 20 this year. There are
I think it becomes part of stable automaticly when the current unstable
changes into stable. Security upgrades are the only exception I know of.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: The Source will be with you... always.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Robin wrote:
Hi,
What are the conditions for a package to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
