Debian packages for gphoto2 beta2

Hi. I have repackaged gphoto2 beta2 for Debian unstable. deb http://www.ping.uio.no/~oka/debian unstable main deb-src http://www.ping.uio.no/~oka/debian unstable main (www.ping.uio.no seems to be down at the moment, but it should be up in an hour or so.) Could someone check/sign and upload

Fwd: Bug#115234: bison++: conflict with bison and tasksel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have gotten complicated bug here and need some advice. From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, when I use tasksel and choose the C/C++ development task, tasksel wants to replace bison++ with bison. The following packages will be REMOVED:

problem with build dependencies

I have the following build-depencies: Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (= 2.95.2), g++ ( 3.0), xlibs-dev This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0. My installed version of g++ is 2.95-4: % dpkg -l g++ Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold |

Re: problem with build dependencies

Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am I trying to do something stupid here? g++ is 2.95.x and g++-3.0 is 3.0.x, so you just have to remove g++ ( 3.0) I guess. -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org -- To

Re: problem with build dependencies

Thus spoke Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001-10-11 21:39:55: I have the following build-depencies: Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (= 2.95.2), g++ ( 3.0), xlibs-dev This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0. [...] Am I trying to do

Re: problem with build dependencies

Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have the following build-depencies: Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (= 2.95.2), g++ ( 3.0), xlibs-dev This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0. That's the wrong solution; you need to fix your package

Re: problem with build dependencies

Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am I trying to do something stupid here? For hppa, maybe (I'm not sure) Build-Conflicts: g++-3.0 -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: problem with build dependencies

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote: dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the version field... Yes. apt-cache show reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem, thanks to James and everybody else who replied. BTW, the upstream author

Re: overwriting files

Em Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:53:00 +0200 Regnat Nikolaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Unpacking cursorsmall (from cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/cursor.pcf.gz', which

Re: overwriting files

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 07:56:04PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Unpacking cursorsmall (from cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/cursor.pcf.gz', which is

How granular should a package{,set} be?

Hi there, I'm starting to investigate making Debian packages of something I wrote -- a proxy firewall kit[0]. I have so far assembled a single package containing all of the binaries and some documentation[1]. dpkg-deb says Installed-Size: 352 so it's not worryingly large. However, it

Debian packages for gphoto2 beta2

Hi. I have repackaged gphoto2 beta2 for Debian unstable. deb http://www.ping.uio.no/~oka/debian unstable main deb-src http://www.ping.uio.no/~oka/debian unstable main (www.ping.uio.no seems to be down at the moment, but it should be up in an hour or so.) Could someone check/sign and upload

Fwd: Bug#115234: bison++: conflict with bison and tasksel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have gotten complicated bug here and need some advice. From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, when I use tasksel and choose the C/C++ development task, tasksel wants to replace bison++ with bison. The following packages will be REMOVED:

problem with build dependencies

I have the following build-depencies: Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (= 2.95.2), g++ ( 3.0), xlibs-dev This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0. My installed version of g++ is 2.95-4: % dpkg -l g++ Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold |

Re: problem with build dependencies

Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am I trying to do something stupid here? g++ is 2.95.x and g++-3.0 is 3.0.x, so you just have to remove g++ ( 3.0) I guess. -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org

Re: problem with build dependencies

Thus spoke Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001-10-11 21:39:55: I have the following build-depencies: Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (= 2.95.2), g++ ( 3.0), xlibs-dev This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0. [...] Am I trying to do

Re: problem with build dependencies

Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have the following build-depencies: Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (= 2.95.2), g++ ( 3.0), xlibs-dev This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0. That's the wrong solution; you need to fix your package

overwriting files

Hi there! I'm trying to create a package which replaces the black cursor from XFree86 with a white one. Unfortunately it is not possible to install a packge which overwrites files already installed by another package. I get the following message if I try to install my package:

Re: problem with build dependencies

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote: dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the version field... Yes. apt-cache show reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem, thanks to James and everybody else who replied. BTW, the upstream author

Re: overwriting files

Em Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:53:00 +0200 Regnat Nikolaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Unpacking cursorsmall (from cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/cursor.pcf.gz', which

How granular should a package{,set} be?

Hi there, I'm starting to investigate making Debian packages of something I wrote -- a proxy firewall kit[0]. I have so far assembled a single package containing all of the binaries and some documentation[1]. dpkg-deb says Installed-Size: 352 so it's not worryingly large. However, it

Re: overwriting files

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 07:56:04PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Unpacking cursorsmall (from cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing cursorsmall_1-1_i386.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/cursor.pcf.gz', which